At 17:33 02/02/2005, Martin Stecher wrote:
I don't see how D (email body modification) "falls back"
to A (command
modification), but as long as it can be done, I don't
care what letter
gets assigned to it.
On Jan 20 you replied to an earlier message saying:
> Yes, I think that operating on the DATA portion fits into the
> architecture without the need for special consideration.
That is what I wanted to describe here again. The email
message body is
the data coming after the DATA command. It can be seen also
as command
modification. No special consideration necessary -> D "falls
back" to A.
This is true with unstructured text. But not with structured
text messages
(XML, ASN.1, proprietary formats, signals, etc.).
I don't understand what the content type of the message body has
to do with this. Please explain.