Markus,
we will do that in the next two weeks
abbie
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-ietf-openproxy(_at_)mail(_dot_)imc(_dot_)org
[mailto:owner-ietf-openproxy(_at_)mail(_dot_)imc(_dot_)org] On Behalf Of
Markus Hofmann
Sent: Wednesday, March 23, 2005 1:15 PM
To: OPES Group
Subject: Re: Next Step on Uses Cases Draft
It's less about "having" the list, it's more about getting
the list in
written words and int othe draft.
-Markus
jfcm wrote:
At 06:34 23/03/2005, Markus Hofmann wrote:
Folks,
coming out of the IETF Meeting in Minneapolis, we need to
revamp our
SMTP Use Cases Draft.
The current draft attempts to categorize use cases and to come up
with
sort of a classification. Instead of doing this, general
feedback was
that the draft should explain/list very concret uses
cases. This will
help to set the scope.
Maybe a structure similar to the one we had in the outdated/expired
document
http://papers.mhof.com/draft-beck-opes-esfnep-> 01.txt might be
helpful (forget about the "business
model" parts, but the listing of
use case descriptions seems helpful). MArtin's list at
http://www.martin-stecher.de/opes/smtpusecases.html looks
like a good
starting point - the uses cases just would have to be detailed.
Any opinions? We need to get this wrapped up very soon.
We collectively did that 3 months ago. Just take all the cases we
documented in "SMTP Uses case" thread and my "applications
addition".
And say were/how we will carry all of them.
I am not sure I have all the mails stored, so I cannot do it. We can
also have a rerun. Whan we have all the list, we could send
it on the
general list calling for additional suggestions. This would
might give
some new ideas. We would get notice, probably interest and support.
jfc