ietf-smime
[Top] [All Lists]

Re[4]: 2nd S/MIME BOF meeting minutes

1997-04-17 05:22:14
     >   Mail capability information is better left in your X.500 entry >   
     >(someday!)
     
     >Until then we bable :)
     
     
     No we don't bable - WE PLAN for that eventuality and design protocols 
     and certificates that separate that information instead of embedding 
     it.
     
     David Gaon


______________________________ Reply Separator _________________________________
Subject: Re: Re[2]: 2nd S/MIME BOF meeting minutes
Author:  Geoff Klein <geoff(_at_)commtouch(_dot_)co(_dot_)il> at smtp
Date:    4/16/97 6:28 PM


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
     
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
     
To: wohler(_at_)uluru(_dot_)worldtalk(_dot_)com, BlakeR(_at_)deming(_dot_)com, 
spock(_at_)RSA(_dot_)COM,
 ietf-smime(_at_)imc(_dot_)org, gaond(_at_)ncr(_dot_)disa(_dot_)mil
Date: Wed Apr 16 23:49:26 1997
     
Bill Wohler,
     
  More often than certificates would.  I see people using more than 
  one mail system at the same time as well.
     
Presumably with separate email addresses, identities/credentials and 
certificates ?
     
  Mail capability information is better left in your X.500 entry 
  (someday!)
     
Until then we bable :)
     
Geoff.
     
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.3i
Charset: noconv
     
iQCVAwUBM1VJbELv5OMYFK1FAQEV/wP/RAASFwkvarQLWhFG5U7u09KcVDmHS+UP 
kNLEFCV8nMESm3HmzD5cU5odrtEgZcjKJslPLZtequXNMTd88FrLPsKsPQcfQzVm 
t0sXzaedzyomq9/BpIFvWGtU8zSUrB3o+Lm61IUZpdjHjKTkc/O9agzCzIcShi4l 
G6rvc68SyBg=
=25QH
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
     


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>