Re: The "name" parameter

ietf-smime

Re: The "name" parameter

1997-07-25 16:51:39

Jamie Zawinski wrote:

Why?  This has been a constant thorn in my side.  Does anyone actually
object to content-disposition, or is the problem just that nobody has
yet gotten off their butt and pushed it through?


(To be precise, content-disposition is currently an Experimental RFC)

Last I heard (about a year ago), the problem was internationalization.

[More with this subject...]

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
The "name" parameter, John Gardiner Myers Re: The "name" parameter, Paul Hoffman / IMC Re: The "name" parameter, Jamie Zawinski Re: The "name" parameter, John Gardiner Myers <= Re: The "name" parameter, Ned Freed Re: The "name" parameter, Ned Freed Re: The "name" parameter, Ned Freed RE: The "name" parameter, Nicolls, J. Weston

Previous by Date:	RE: Attempt to clear off the open issues, Blake Ramsdell
Next by Date:	Re: application/mime and binary data, Paul Hoffman / IMC
Previous by Thread:	Re: The "name" parameter, Jamie Zawinski
Next by Thread:	Re: The "name" parameter, Ned Freed
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]