Re: The "name" parameter

Paul Hoffman / IMC wrote:
> The Content-Disposition work has not moved to RFC status yet. Thus,
> the "anticipation" is a bit premature.
Why?  This has been a constant thorn in my side.  Does anyone actually
object to content-disposition, or is the problem just that nobody has
yet gotten off their butt and pushed it through?

-- 
Jamie Zawinski         http://people.netscape.com/jwz/      about:jwz