jsp(_at_)jgvandyke(_dot_)com (John Pawling) writes:
MLReceiptPolicy ::= CHOICE {
none [0] NULL,
insteadOf [1] SEQUENCE SIZE (1..64) OF GeneralNames,
inAdditionTo [2] SEQUENCE SIZE (1..64) OF GeneralNames }
Since GeneralNames is already a SEQUENCE SIZE (1...someone-elses-MAX) OF
GeneralName, shouldn't these fields be GeneralName (without the 's')?
Alternatively, just use GeneralNames (without the SEQUENCE OF), since it's
already defined elsewhere. This problem (using GeneralNames instead of
GeneralName) occurs in various other places as well...
While I'm commenting on MLReceiptPolicy, the tagging on the NULL isn't
necessary, since it's distinct from the two SEQUENCEs - all you need is [0]
and [1] to distinguish the SEQUENCEs.
Peter.