Re: draft-ietf-smime-idea2000-02-23 14:11:213. I would like this document to become a Standards Track document. Not to disagree with the WG chair, but it is unclear why this should be on standards track. It is protocol information for the community about a non-mandatory algorithm that, as far as we can tell, is barely used. Because of that, isn't it much better qualified for Informational RFC? --Paul Hoffman, Director --Internet Mail Consortium
|
|