A new Request for Comments is now available in online RFC libraries.
RFC 4853
Title: Cryptographic Message Syntax (CMS) Multiple
Signer Clarification
Author: R. Housley
Status: Standards Track
Date: April 2007
Mailbox: housley(_at_)vigilsec(_dot_)com
Pages: 5
Characters: 10146
Updates: RFC3852
See-Also:
I-D Tag: draft-ietf-smime-cms-mult-sign-03.txt
URL: http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc4853.txt
This document updates the Cryptographic Message Syntax (CMS), which is
published in RFC 3852. This document clarifies the proper handling of
the SignedData protected content type when more than one digital
signature is present. [STANDARDS TRACK]
This document is a product of the S/MIME Mail Security
Working Group of the IETF.
This is now a Proposed Standard Protocol.
STANDARDS TRACK: This document specifies an Internet standards track
protocol for the Internet community,and requests discussion and
suggestions for improvements.Please refer to the current edition of the
Internet Official Protocol Standards (STD 1) for the standardization
state and status of this protocol. Distribution of this memo is
unlimited.
This announcement is sent to the IETF list and the RFC-DIST list.
Requests to be added to or deleted from the IETF distribution list
should be sent to IETF-REQUEST(_at_)IETF(_dot_)ORG(_dot_) Requests to be
added to or deleted from the RFC-DIST distribution list should
be sent to RFC-DIST-REQUEST(_at_)RFC-EDITOR(_dot_)ORG(_dot_)
Details on obtaining RFCs via FTP or EMAIL may be obtained by sending
an EMAIL message to rfc-info(_at_)RFC-EDITOR(_dot_)ORG with the message body
help: ways_to_get_rfcs. For example:
To: rfc-info(_at_)RFC-EDITOR(_dot_)ORG
Subject: getting rfcs
help: ways_to_get_rfcs
Requests for special distribution should be addressed to either the
author of the RFC in question, or to
RFC-Manager(_at_)RFC-EDITOR(_dot_)ORG(_dot_) Unless
specifically noted otherwise on the RFC itself, all RFCs are for
unlimited distribution.
Submissions for Requests for Comments should be sent to
RFC-EDITOR(_at_)RFC-EDITOR(_dot_)ORG(_dot_) Please consult RFC 2223,
Instructions to RFC
Authors, for further information.
The RFC Editor Team
USC/Information Sciences Institute
...