RE: S/MIME v3.2 IDs key size text

At 8:51 PM -0400 5/3/08, Turner, Sean P. wrote:
> I think if we struck ", namely 1024 bits" from the text in the security
> considerations that it's still a true statement and we won't have to change
> it every time we update the spec.
I'm OK with that, but I also feel that if we're updating the minimum 
mandatory signing length, it is trivial to update the Security 
Considerations as well.