Re: Comments (II) on draft-church-dns-mail-sender-02.txt

> > and no, it's not necessary to determine the real sender's identity, and this
> > might not even be desirable.   an alternative proposal is forthcoming.
>      When you have such a proposal I'd be interested in reading it.  Until
> then, I'm going to continue with mine.
of course.

actually I think there are some interesting ideas in your proposal
which might dovetail well with some of the ideas in mine. 

Keith