ietf-smtp
[Top] [All Lists]
<prev [Date] next>
[Advanced]
 <prev [Thread] next>

what to say on timeout?

2004-01-03 18:35:25
from [Richard O. Hammer] [Permanent Link]
When a SMTP server breaks a connection to a SMTP client because of long inactivity (as suggested in RFC 2821 Section 4.5.3.2), should it break the connection silently? or should it first send a 451, 554, or some other reply code? 

Thanks,
Rich Hammer
[More with this subject...]
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Previous by Date:  Re: RFC2821, section 4.1.1.1 and HELO/EHLO, B. Johannessen
Next by Date:  Re: what to say on timeout?, John C Klensin
Previous by Thread:  RFC2821, section 4.1.1.1 and HELO/EHLO, Valdis . Kletnieks
Next by Thread:  Re: what to say on timeout?, John C Klensin
Indexes:  [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]