IETF SMTP (date)
January 29, 2004
- Re: Last Call: 'A No Soliciting SMTP Service Extension' to Proposed Standard, Keith Moore, 06:44
- Re: Last Call: 'A No Soliciting SMTP Service Extension' to Proposed Standard, Hector Santos, 06:36
- Re: Last Call: 'A No Soliciting SMTP Service Extension' to Proposed Standard, Keith Moore, 06:18
- Re: Last Call: 'A No Soliciting SMTP Service Extension' to Proposed Standard, Hector Santos, 05:49
- Re: Last Call: 'A No Soliciting SMTP Service Extension' to Proposed Standard, Hector Santos, 03:57
- Re: Last Call: 'A No Soliciting SMTP Service Extension' to Proposed Standard, Hector Santos, 03:02
January 28, 2004
- Re: Last Call: 'A No Soliciting SMTP Service Extension' to Proposed Standard, Carl Malamud, 18:48
- Re: Last Call: 'A No Soliciting SMTP Service Extension' to Proposed Standard, Keith Moore, 18:32
- Re: Last Call: 'A No Soliciting SMTP Service Extension' to Proposed Standard, Carl Malamud, 15:10
- Re: Last Call: 'A No Soliciting SMTP Service Extension' to Proposed Standard, Harald Tveit Alvestrand, 15:06
- Re: Last Call: 'A No Soliciting SMTP Service Extension' to Proposed Standard, Keith Moore, 15:01
- Re: Last Call: 'A No Soliciting SMTP Service Extension' to Proposed Standard, Keith Moore, 13:59
- Re: Last Call: 'A No Soliciting SMTP Service Extension' to Proposed Standard, Arnt Gulbrandsen, 10:24
- Re: Last Call: 'A No Soliciting SMTP Service Extension' to Proposed Standard, Keith Moore, 09:04
- Re: Last Call: 'A No Soliciting SMTP Service Extension' to Proposed Standard, Carl Malamud, 08:51
- Re: Last Call: 'A No Soliciting SMTP Service Extension' to Proposed Standard, Arnt Gulbrandsen, 08:41
- Re: Last Call: 'A No Soliciting SMTP Service Extension' to Proposed Standard, Keith Moore, 08:39
- Re: Last Call: 'A No Soliciting SMTP Service Extension' to Proposed Standard, Carl Malamud, 08:29
- Re: Last Call: 'A No Soliciting SMTP Service Extension' to Proposed Standard, Hector Santos, 07:37
- Re: Last Call: 'A No Soliciting SMTP Service Extension' to Proposed Standard, Arnt Gulbrandsen, 06:01
- Re: "Subject" in the envelope (was: Re: Comments requested on draft-malamud-no-soliciting-04.txt), Hector Santos, 01:19
January 27, 2004
- Re: CERT Advisory CA-2004-02 Email-borne Viruses, Hector Santos, 23:27
- Re: Last Call: 'A No Soliciting SMTP Service Extension' to Proposed Standard, ned+ietf-smtp, 22:04
- Re: CERT Advisory CA-2004-02 Email-borne Viruses, Keith Moore, 20:56
- CERT Advisory CA-2004-02 Email-borne Viruses, Hector Santos, 19:44
- Re: Last Call: 'A No Soliciting SMTP Service Extension' to Proposed Standard, Carl Malamud, 18:41
- Re: I-D ACTION:draft-klensin-email-envelope-00.txt, Martin Duerst, 13:00
- Re: Last Call: 'A No Soliciting SMTP Service Extension' to Proposed Standard, Keith Moore, 11:44
- Re: Last Call: 'A No Soliciting SMTP Service Extension' to Proposed Standard, Carl Malamud, 07:19
- Re: "Subject" in the envelope (was: Re: Comments requested on draft-malamud-no-soliciting-04.txt), Hector Santos, 06:49
January 26, 2004
- Re: "Subject" in the envelope (was: Re: Comments requested on draft-malamud-no-soliciting-04.txt), John C Klensin, 21:12
- Re: I-D ACTION:draft-klensin-email-envelope-00.txt, Hector Santos, 19:35
- Re: "Subject" in the envelope (was: Re: Comments requested on draft-malamud-no-soliciting-04.txt), Hector Santos, 19:15
- "Subject" in the envelope (was: Re: Comments requested on draft-malamud-no-soliciting-04.txt), John C Klensin, 17:17
- Re: Last Call: 'A No Soliciting SMTP Service Extension' to Proposed Standard, Keith Moore, 13:12
- Re: I-D ACTION:draft-klensin-email-envelope-00.txt, Martin Duerst, 09:05
- Re: I-D ACTION:draft-klensin-email-envelope-00.txt, william(_at_)elan(_dot_)net, 07:15
- Re: I-D ACTION:draft-klensin-email-envelope-00.txt, Nathaniel Borenstein, 06:52
- Re: I-D ACTION:draft-klensin-email-envelope-00.txt, Hector Santos, 00:55
January 25, 2004
- Re: I-D ACTION:draft-klensin-email-envelope-00.txt, Hector Santos, 23:35
- Re: I-D ACTION:draft-klensin-email-envelope-00.txt, J-F C. (Jefsey) Morfin, 21:01
- Re: I-D ACTION:draft-klensin-email-envelope-00.txt, Keith Moore, 17:59
- Re: I-D ACTION:draft-klensin-email-envelope-00.txt, william, 17:50
- Re: I-D ACTION:draft-klensin-email-envelope-00.txt, Keith Moore, 17:27
- Re: Comments requested on draft-malamud-no-soliciting-04.txt, Carl Malamud, 09:02
- Re: Comments requested on draft-malamud-no-soliciting-04.txt, Hector Santos, 04:40
- Re: Comments requested on draft-malamud-no-soliciting-04.txt, Arnt Gulbrandsen, 00:12
January 24, 2004
- Comments requested on draft-malamud-no-soliciting-04.txt, ned+ietf-smtp, 16:24
- Re: I-D ACTION:draft-klensin-email-envelope-00.txt, Eric A. Hall, 16:09
- New mail-ng mailing list open for sign-ups, Paul Hoffman / IMC, 14:35
- Re: I-D ACTION:draft-klensin-email-envelope-00.txt, Nathaniel Borenstein, 13:47
- Re: I-D ACTION:draft-klensin-email-envelope-00.txt, John C Klensin, 06:31
- Re: I-D ACTION:draft-klensin-email-envelope-00.txt, Hector Santos, 03:58
- Re: I-D ACTION:draft-klensin-email-envelope-00.txt, Valdis . Kletnieks, 01:36
- Re: I-D ACTION:draft-klensin-email-envelope-00.txt, Hector Santos, 00:17
- Re: I-D ACTION:draft-klensin-email-envelope-00.txt, Hector Santos, 00:16
January 23, 2004
- Re: I-D ACTION:draft-klensin-email-envelope-00.txt, Valdis . Kletnieks, 20:24
- [no subject], Valdis . Kletnieks, 20:00
- Re: I-D ACTION:draft-klensin-email-envelope-00.txt, John C Klensin, 19:36
- Re: I-D ACTION:draft-klensin-email-envelope-00.txt, Hector Santos, 19:23
- Re: I-D ACTION:draft-klensin-email-envelope-00.txt, Hector Santos, 19:21
- Re: I-D ACTION:draft-klensin-email-envelope-00.txt, william, 18:28
- [no subject], winserver . support, 18:22
- Re: I-D ACTION:draft-klensin-email-envelope-00.txt, Hector Santos, 18:03
- Re: I-D ACTION:draft-klensin-email-envelope-00.txt, John C Klensin, 17:40
- Re: I-D ACTION:draft-klensin-email-envelope-00.txt, Nathaniel Borenstein, 15:51
- FWD: I-D ACTION:draft-klensin-email-envelope-00.txt, John C Klensin, 14:53
January 16, 2004
- Re: CBV systems - was Re: SMTP Extensions - proper peply code for disabled commands, Valdis . Kletnieks, 11:19
- Re: CBV systems - was Re: SMTP Extensions - proper peply code for disabled commands, Hector Santos, 11:01
- Re: CBV systems - was Re: SMTP Extensions - proper peply code for disabled commands, Valdis . Kletnieks, 10:37
- Re: CBV systems - was Re: SMTP Extensions - proper peply code for disabled commands, Hector Santos, 09:28
- Re: CBV systems - was Re: SMTP Extensions - proper reply code for disabled commands, Valdis . Kletnieks, 08:31
- Re: CBV systems - was Re: SMTP Extensions - proper reply code for, Hector Santos, 00:19
January 15, 2004
- Re: CBV systems - was Re: SMTP Extensions - proper peply code for disabled commands, Keith Moore, 21:23
- Re: CBV systems - was Re: SMTP Extensions - proper peply code for disabled commands, Hector Santos, 19:34
- Re: CBV systems - was Re: SMTP Extensions - proper peply code for disabled commands, Keith Moore, 18:25
- Re: CBV systems - was Re: SMTP Extensions - proper reply code for disabled commands, Hector Santos, 14:52
- Re: CBV systems - was Re: SMTP Extensions - proper reply code for disabled commands, Rolf E. Sonneveld, 14:46
- Re: CBV systems - was Re: SMTP Extensions - proper peply code for disabled commands, Hector Santos, 14:21
- Re: CBV systems - was Re: SMTP Extensions - proper reply code for disabled commands, Richard O. Hammer, 14:03
- Re: CBV systems - was Re: SMTP Extensions - proper peply code for disabled commands, Hector Santos, 13:35
- Re: CBV systems - was Re: SMTP Extensions - proper reply code for disabled commands, Hector Santos, 13:20
- Re: CBV systems - was Re: SMTP Extensions - proper peply code for disabled commands, James M Galvin, 07:15
January 14, 2004
- Re: CBV systems - was Re: SMTP Extensions - proper peply code for disabled commands, Valdis . Kletnieks, 20:41
- Re: CBV systems - was Re: SMTP Extensions - proper peply code for disabled commands, Valdis . Kletnieks, 20:37
- Re: CBV systems - was Re: SMTP Extensions - proper peply code for disabled commands, Valdis . Kletnieks, 20:33
- Re: CBV systems - was Re: SMTP Extensions - proper peply code for disabled commands, Keith Moore, 15:40
- Re: CBV systems - was Re: SMTP Extensions - proper peply code for disabled commands, Rolf E. Sonneveld, 15:38
- Re: CBV systems - was Re: SMTP Extensions - proper peply code for disabled commands, Hector Santos, 14:30
- RE: CAN-SPAM was RE: CBV systems - was Re: SMTP Extensions - prop er peply code for disabled commands, esvoboda1, 08:11
- Re: CBV systems - was Re: SMTP Extensions - proper peply code for disabled commands, Keith Moore, 07:47
- Re: CBV systems - was Re: SMTP Extensions - proper peply code for disabled commands, B. Johannessen, 02:54
January 12, 2004
- Re: SMTP Extensions - proper peply code for disabled commands, John C Klensin, 22:50
- Re: Submitting new SMTP related RFC drafts, Hector Santos, 21:45
- Re: Submitting new SMTP related RFC drafts, John C Klensin, 21:42
- Re: Submitting new SMTP related RFC drafts, Valdis . Kletnieks, 21:11
- Re: Submitting new SMTP related RFC drafts, John C Klensin, 19:20
- Submitting new SMTP related RFC drafts, Hector Santos, 16:01
January 07, 2004
- Re: what to say on timeout?, Eric A. Hall, 23:51
- Re: what to say on timeout?, Eric A. Hall, 23:41
- Re: what to say on timeout?, Richard O. Hammer, 11:09
- Re: what to say on timeout?, Hector Santos, 11:04
- Re: what to say on timeout?, Eric A. Hall, 10:51
- Re: what to say on timeout?, Valdis . Kletnieks, 09:59
- Re: what to say on timeout?, Paul Smith, 09:50
- Re: what to say on timeout?, Eric A. Hall, 09:05
- Re: what to say on timeout?, John C Klensin, 08:10
January 05, 2004
- Re: what to say on timeout?, Hector Santos, 18:00
- Re: what to say on timeout?, Hector Santos, 17:37
- Re: what to say on timeout?, Paul Smith, 17:00
- Re: what to say on timeout?, Eric A. Hall, 13:32
- Re: what to say on timeout?, Richard O. Hammer, 12:40
- Re: what to say on timeout?, Hector Santos, 11:43
- Re: RFC 2821 Address Resolution, Richard O. Hammer, 11:37
- Re: what to say on timeout?, Hector Santos, 11:26
- Re: what to say on timeout?, Eric A. Hall, 10:46
- Re: what to say on timeout?, Richard O. Hammer, 09:47
- Re: RFC 2821 Address Resolution, Hector Santos, 07:20
- Re: RFC 2821 Address Resolution, Brad Clements, 06:36
- Re: what to say on timeout?, Arnt Gulbrandsen, 03:39
- Re: RFC 2821 Address Resolution, Arnt Gulbrandsen, 03:01
- Re: RFC 2821 Address Resolution, Valdis . Kletnieks, 02:01
- Re: RFC 2821 Address Resolution, Hector Santos, 01:25
January 04, 2004
- Re: RFC 2821 Address Resolution, Valdis . Kletnieks, 23:35
- Re: RFC 2821 Address Resolution, Valdis . Kletnieks, 22:43
- Re: what to say on timeout?, Hector Santos, 22:32
- Re: RFC 2821 Address Resolution, Hector Santos, 22:09
- Re: what to say on timeout?, Richard O. Hammer, 20:47
- Re: RFC 2821 Address Resolution, Hector Santos, 20:19
- Re: RFC 2821 Address Resolution, Hector Santos, 19:45
- Re: RFC 2821 Address Resolution, Valdis . Kletnieks, 14:31
- Re: RFC 2821 Address Resolution, Hector Santos, 13:31
- Re: RFC 2821 Address Resolution, Richard O. Hammer, 13:24
- Re: spam relays on secondary MX, Valdis . Kletnieks, 13:09
- spam relays on secondary MX, Jun-ichiro itojun Hagino, 12:28
- Re: RFC 2821 Address Resolution, Valdis . Kletnieks, 12:09
- RFC 2821 Address Resolution, Hector Santos, 05:40
January 03, 2004
- Re: what to say on timeout?, Hector Santos, 21:03
- Re: what to say on timeout?, Hector Santos, 20:33
- Re: what to say on timeout?, Richard O. Hammer, 19:58
- Re: what to say on timeout?, Richard O. Hammer, 19:39
- Re: what to say on timeout?, John C Klensin, 19:23
- what to say on timeout?, Richard O. Hammer, 18:35
- Re: RFC2821, section 4.1.1.1 and HELO/EHLO, B. Johannessen, 09:49
- Re: RFC2821, section 4.1.1.1 and HELO/EHLO, John C Klensin, 08:25
January 02, 2004
- Re: RFC2821, section 4.1.1.1 and HELO/EHLO, Valdis . Kletnieks, 17:39
- Re: RFC2821, section 4.1.1.1 and HELO/EHLO, Hector Santos, 17:23
- Re: RFC2821, section 4.1.1.1 and HELO/EHLO, Hector Santos, 16:55
- Re: RFC2821, section 4.1.1.1 and HELO/EHLO, B. Johannessen, 16:41
- Re: RFC2821, section 4.1.1.1 and HELO/EHLO, Valdis . Kletnieks, 16:14
- Re: RFC2821, section 4.1.1.1 and HELO/EHLO, Valdis . Kletnieks, 15:58
- Re: RFC2821, section 4.1.1.1 and HELO/EHLO, John C Klensin, 15:41
- Re: RFC2821, section 4.1.1.1 and HELO/EHLO, B. Johannessen, 14:33
- RFC2821, section 4.1.1.1 and HELO/EHLO, Valdis . Kletnieks, 11:50