----- Original Message -----
From: "John C Klensin" <john+smtp(_at_)jck(_dot_)com>
To: "Hector Santos" <winserver(_dot_)support(_at_)winserver(_dot_)com>;
Sent: Tuesday, January 13, 2004 12:50 AM
Subject: Re: SMTP Extensions - proper peply code for disabled commands
p.s. Your server seems to not like Reverse-paths that contain
plus signs, or otherwise has problems "verifying addresses" with
which other systems seem to have no difficulty. Might be
worth trying to fix if you expect to participate in IETF
discussions, since a number of folks around here use addresses
of that type.
Our server is calling a CBV (Callback Verifier) service, apparently the "+"
signed is being escaped incorrectly.
I'll take care it pronto, in fact, its fixed now.
Thanks for pointing it out.
Hector Santos, Santronics Software, Inc.