On Tue, 2004-01-13 at 21:59, Hector Santos wrote:
Like I said, I thought about pleading the 5th here because I understand very
clearly the sensitive nature of this topic. I have much to say, yet it may
not be all worth it the stress that it may generate (especially for those
who are philosophically oppose, right or wrong).
I for one found this message most informative. And I'm leaning
towards agreeing with those who are "philosophically opposed".
More information on practical use of SMTP call-backs would be
a good thing for both sides of the debate. It can only increase
the quality of the discussion.
I can provide more detail information if you like.
I say go ahead.
Bob
--
-=[ B. Johannessen | bob(_at_)db(_dot_)org -=- http://db.org/ | +4797152009 ]=-
-=[ Mail & Spam - News, Drafts & Standards - http://db.org/blog/ ]=-
-=[ On the Origin Of Spam: Spam Statistics - http://db.org/spam/ ]=-