Re: CBV systems - was Re: SMTP Extensions - proper reply code for disabl

I am trying to follow this thread, but do not know what CBV standsfor. Could someone enlighten me? Thank you.


Rich Hammer

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
Re: SMTP Extensions - proper peply code for disabled commands, (continued) Re: SMTP Extensions - proper peply code for disabled commands, Hector Santos Re: SMTP Extensions - proper peply code for disabled commands, John C Klensin Re: SMTP Extensions - proper peply code for disabled commands, Hector Santos Re: SMTP Extensions - proper peply code for disabled commands, Keith Moore CBV systems - was Re: SMTP Extensions - proper peply code for disabled commands, Hector Santos Re: CBV systems - was Re: SMTP Extensions - proper peply code for disabled commands, B. Johannessen Re: CBV systems - was Re: SMTP Extensions - proper peply code for disabled commands, Keith Moore Re: CBV systems - was Re: SMTP Extensions - proper peply code for disabled commands, Hector Santos Re: CBV systems - was Re: SMTP Extensions - proper peply code for disabled commands, Rolf E. Sonneveld Re: CBV systems - was Re: SMTP Extensions - proper reply code for disabled commands, Hector Santos Re: CBV systems - was Re: SMTP Extensions - proper reply code for disabled commands, Richard O. Hammer <= Re: CBV systems - was Re: SMTP Extensions - proper reply code for disabled commands, Rolf E. Sonneveld Re: CBV systems - was Re: SMTP Extensions - proper reply code for disabled commands, Hector Santos Re: CBV systems - was Re: SMTP Extensions - proper reply code for disabled commands, Valdis . Kletnieks Re: CBV systems - was Re: SMTP Extensions - proper peply code for disabled commands, Keith Moore Re: CBV systems - was Re: SMTP Extensions - proper peply code for disabled commands, Valdis . Kletnieks Re: CBV systems - was Re: SMTP Extensions - proper peply code for disabled commands, James M Galvin Re: CBV systems - was Re: SMTP Extensions - proper peply code for disabled commands, Hector Santos Re: CBV systems - was Re: SMTP Extensions - proper peply code for disabled commands, Keith Moore Re: CBV systems - was Re: SMTP Extensions - proper peply code for disabled commands, Hector Santos Re: CBV systems - was Re: SMTP Extensions - proper peply code for disabled commands, Keith Moore

Re: CBV systems - was Re: SMTP Extensions - proper reply code for disabled commands