Re: CBV systems - was Re: SMTP Extensions - proper peply code for disabled commands
2004-01-15 18:25:52
I could reply to your reply in detail but that would only distract from
the important points in this debate.
the points are these:
if widely adopted CBV will impair the reliability of the mail system by
causing delivery failures for legitimate messages in cases where
delivery would otherwise have been successful (i.e. if the return-path
field was invalid or not usable due to a configuration error or
temporary failure)
since CBV is easily circumvented by spammers, in the long term CBV does
no good - it only introduces overhead.
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- Re: CBV systems - was Re: SMTP Extensions - proper peply code for disabled commands, (continued)
- Re: CBV systems - was Re: SMTP Extensions - proper reply code for disabled commands, Valdis . Kletnieks
- Re: CBV systems - was Re: SMTP Extensions - proper peply code for disabled commands, Keith Moore
- Re: CBV systems - was Re: SMTP Extensions - proper peply code for disabled commands, Valdis . Kletnieks
- Re: CBV systems - was Re: SMTP Extensions - proper peply code for disabled commands, James M Galvin
- Re: CBV systems - was Re: SMTP Extensions - proper peply code for disabled commands, Hector Santos
- Re: CBV systems - was Re: SMTP Extensions - proper peply code for disabled commands,
Keith Moore <=
- Re: CBV systems - was Re: SMTP Extensions - proper peply code for disabled commands, Hector Santos
- Re: CBV systems - was Re: SMTP Extensions - proper peply code for disabled commands, Keith Moore
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Re: CBV systems - was Re: SMTP Extensions - proper peply code for disabled commands, Hector Santos
- Re: CBV systems - was Re: SMTP Extensions - proper peply code for disabled commands, Valdis . Kletnieks
- Re: CBV systems - was Re: SMTP Extensions - proper peply code for disabled commands, Hector Santos
- Re: CBV systems - was Re: SMTP Extensions - proper peply code for disabled commands, Valdis . Kletnieks
- Re: CBV systems - was Re: SMTP Extensions - proper peply code for disabled commands, Valdis . Kletnieks
- Re: CBV systems - was Re: SMTP Extensions - proper peply code for disabled commands, Valdis . Kletnieks
- Re: CBV systems - was Re: SMTP Extensions - proper peply code for disabled commands, Hector Santos
|
|
|