I believe this is from an earlier draft. Go reread the law as it was
actually passed by Congress. I don't see IETF mentioned in that law.
Basically as I read the law, IETF isn't in the loop, and there's no
expectation that any protocol extensions are needed.
hmmmm I thought I had a reference the most current bill when it was
finalized.. let me check again,
ok, I reference the wrong section. It is section 11.2.
ah, thanks. it must be that every time I read the bill, my eyes had glazed
over or my brain had siezed before I got to that point.
(as bad as they are, IETF documents are a model of clarity compared to this.)