[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Last Call: 'A No Soliciting SMTP Service Extension' to Proposed Standard

2004-01-28 13:59:16

Keith Moore writes:
 Btw, I also suggest sticking in some text noting that supporting 
 SOLICIT as server does not require supporting it as SMTP client.

what purpose would that server, other than discourage servers from relaying
SOLICIT parameters?

I'm just tired of hearing variations of "PIPELINING is hard to implement".

it's a different problem, I think.  PIPELINING isn't an end-to-end service, 
so implementing just the server half of PIPELINING is perfectly reasonable.
OTOH, the carraige of SOLICIT wants to be an end-to-end service.

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>