ietf-smtp
[Top] [All Lists]

RE: CAN-SPAM was RE: CBV systems - was Re: SMTP Extensions - prop er peply code for disabled commands

2004-01-14 08:11:37


Keith Moore wrote:

CAN-SPAM is a crock.  We should not presume that the US Congress is 
qualified to dictate technical standards - heck, they can't even write 
nontechnical laws that are in the public interest.


--

I agree about CAN-SPAM.  I have seen a slight decrease during the first 13
days of this month over December in terms of the amount of SPAM we have
received.  In the last few days I am seeing the numbers increase so I'm left
to assume that people are just moving off shore.

Frankly, the US Congress isn't going to help by legislating a global system.
We have to do it ourselves either through technology or self policing.  I
would vastly prefer an extension to SMTP that allowed for the passing of an
authentication code for each e-mail sent that would have to be verified by
the receiving system.


Ed 



<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
  • RE: CAN-SPAM was RE: CBV systems - was Re: SMTP Extensions - prop er peply code for disabled commands, esvoboda1 <=