ietf-smtp
[Top] [All Lists]
<prev [Date] next>
[Advanced]
 <prev [Thread] next>

Re: RFC2821bis-01 Issue 2: VRFY/EXPN

2007-03-28 19:23:35
from [Tony Hansen] [Permanent Link] 

As yet, there has been no discussion on this issue.

Any comments?

        Tony Hansen
        tony(_at_)att(_dot_)com

John C Klensin wrote:


Question:  The second paragraph of Section 3.5.3 has been rewritten
slightly for clarity and to note the parallelism between VRFY and
RCPT.   This should be checked carefully by someone with experience
actually using VRFY other than me.
[More with this subject...]
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Previous by Date:  RFC2821bis-01 Issue 7: Use of 2119 definitions for conformity language (was: Re: 2821bis chapter 2), John C Klensin
Next by Date:  Re: RFC2821bis-01 Issue 4: Client actions on receipt of 4yz and 5yz codes, Tony Hansen
Previous by Thread:  RFC2821bis-01 Issue 2: VRFY/EXPN, John C Klensin
Next by Thread:  Re: RFC2821bis-01 Issue 2: VRFY/EXPN, Hector Santos
Indexes:  [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]