IETF SMTP (date)
March 31, 2007
- RFC2821bis-01 Issue 12: IPv6 MX records and transitions (was: Re: IPv6), John C Klensin, 18:29
- Re: Submit and HELO (was: Re: RFC2821bis-01 Issue 3: EHLO parameter), John C Klensin, 18:29
- More references in 2821bis (was: Re: Submit and HELO), John C Klensin, 17:14
- Re: Submit and HELO, Frank Ellermann, 15:44
- Re: Submit and HELO (was: Re: RFC2821bis-01 Issue 3: EHLO parameter), Robert A. Rosenberg, 14:12
- Re: IPv6, Frank Ellermann, 13:53
- Re: IPv6 (was: RFC2821bis-01 Issue 3: EHLO parameter), John C Klensin, 12:43
- Re: RFC2821bis-01 Issue 3: EHLO parameter, John C Klensin, 12:26
- IPv6 (was: RFC2821bis-01 Issue 3: EHLO parameter), Frank Ellermann, 12:13
- Re: RFC2821bis-01 Issue 3: EHLO parameter, Frank Ellermann, 11:31
- Submit and HELO (was: RFC2821bis-01 Issue 3: EHLO parameter), Frank Ellermann, 11:14
- Re: mechanism vs. policy for email (and RFC2821bis), Frank Ellermann, 10:53
- Submit and HELO (was: Re: RFC2821bis-01 Issue 3: EHLO parameter), John C Klensin, 07:47
- mechanism vs. policy for email (and RFC2821bis), Dave Crocker, 06:08
- Re: RFC2821bis-01 Issue 3: EHLO parameter, Dave Crocker, 04:02
- Re: RFC2821bis-01 Issue 3: EHLO parameter, Hector Santos, 03:40
- Re: RFC2821bis-01 Issue 3: EHLO parameter, Hector Santos, 02:38
- Re: RFC2821bis-01 Issue 3: EHLO parameter, Hector Santos, 02:20
March 30, 2007
- Re: RFC2821bis-01 Issue 3: EHLO parameter, Robert A. Rosenberg, 23:56
- Re: RFC2821bis-01 Issue 3: EHLO parameter, Tony Finch, 09:21
- Re: RFC2821bis-01 Issue 3: EHLO parameter, John C Klensin, 08:59
- Re: RFC2821bis-01 Issue 3: EHLO parameter, Alex van den Bogaerdt, 08:30
- Re: RFC2821bis-01 Issue 3: EHLO parameter, Hector Santos, 04:03
- Re: RFC2821bis-01 Issue 3: EHLO parameter, Hector Santos, 03:42
- Re: RFC2821bis-01 Issue 3: EHLO parameter, Hector Santos, 03:40
- Re: RFC2821bis-01 Issue 4: Client actions on receipt of 4yz and 5yz codes, Peter J. Holzer, 01:29
March 29, 2007
- Re: RFC2821bis-01 Issue 3: EHLO parameter, Robert A. Rosenberg, 18:03
- Re: DATA, 221, and close (was: Re: RFC2821bis-01 Issue 8 number of message transactions per connection ?), ned+ietf-smtp, 15:06
- Re: RFC2821bis-01 Issue 3: EHLO parameter, John C Klensin, 12:58
- Re: RFC2821bis-01 Issue 3: EHLO parameter, John C Klensin, 12:47
- Re: RFC2821bis-01 Issue 3: EHLO parameter, Frank Ellermann, 12:38
- Re: RFC2821bis-01 Issue 3: EHLO parameter, Frank Ellermann, 12:33
- Re: RFC2821bis-01 Issue 3: EHLO parameter, SM, 12:06
- Re: RFC2821bis-01 Issue 3: EHLO parameter, John C Klensin, 12:04
- Re: RFC2821bis-01 Issue 4: Client actions on receipt of 4yz and 5yz codes, Frank Ellermann, 12:02
- Re: RFC2821bis-01 Issue 3: EHLO parameter, Robert A. Rosenberg, 11:34
- Re: RFC2821bis-01 Issue 8 number of message transactions per connection ?, Robert A. Rosenberg, 11:33
- Re: DATA, 221, and close (was: Re: RFC2821bis-01 Issue 8 number of message transactions per connection ?), John C Klensin, 10:58
- Re: DATA, 221, and close (was: Re: RFC2821bis-01 Issue 8 number of message transactions per connection ?), Bart Schaefer, 10:33
- Re: DATA, 221, and close (was: Re: RFC2821bis-01 Issue 8 number of message transactions per connection ?), Tony Finch, 10:01
- RFC2821bis-01 Issue 10: 251/551 in Security Considerations (was: Re: RFC2821bis-01 Issue 2: VRFY/EXPN), John C Klensin, 09:18
- Re: RFC2821bis-01 Issue 2: VRFY/EXPN, John C Klensin, 09:17
- DATA, 221, and close (was: Re: RFC2821bis-01 Issue 8 number of message transactions per connection ?), John C Klensin, 08:59
- Re: RFC2821bis-01 Issue 2: VRFY/EXPN, ned+ietf-smtp, 08:55
- Re: RFC2821bis-01 Issue 8 number of message transactions per connection ?, Bart Schaefer, 08:51
- Re: RFC2821bis-01 Issue 8 number of message transactions per connection ?, Bart Schaefer, 08:40
- Re: RFC2821bis-01 Issue 4: Client actions on receipt of 4yz and 5yz codes, David F. Skoll, 08:18
- Re: RFC2821bis-01 Issue 8 number of message transactions per connection ?, John C Klensin, 07:46
- Re: RFC2821bis-01 Issue 8 number of message transactions per connection ?, Tony Hansen, 07:46
- Re: RFC2821bis-01 Issue 9: Requirements and limits table or equivalent, John C Klensin, 07:44
- Re: RFC2821bis-01 Issue 8 number of message transactions per connection ?, Matti Aarnio, 07:09
- Re: RFC2821bis-01 Issue 8 number of message transactions per connection ?, John C Klensin, 06:22
- Re: RFC2821bis-01 Issue 8 number of message transactions per connection ?, Arnt Gulbrandsen, 06:04
- Re: TINW was RFC2821b is-01 Issue 1: trailing dot in Domain, Arnt Gulbrandsen, 06:01
- Re: RFC2821bis-01 Issue 4: Client actions on receipt of 4yz and 5yz codes, John C Klensin, 05:53
- Re: RFC2821bis-01 Issue 3: EHLO parameter, John C Klensin, 05:46
- RFC2821bis-01 Issue 8 number of message transactions per connection ?, John C Klensin, 05:25
- Re: RFC2821bis-01 - number of message transactions per connection ?, Tony Finch, 04:48
- Re: RFC2821bis-01 - number of message transactions per connection ?, Hector Santos, 04:48
- Re: RFC2821bis-01 Issue 4: Client actions on receipt of 4yz and 5yz codes, Hector Santos, 04:30
- RFC2821bis-01 - number of message transactions per connection ?, Matti Aarnio, 03:41
- Re: RFC2821bis-01 Issue 2: VRFY/EXPN, Hector Santos, 02:49
- Re: RFC2821bis-01 Issue 2: VRFY/EXPN, Tony Finch, 02:47
- Re: RFC2821bis-01 Issue 3: EHLO parameter, Hector Santos, 02:06
- Re: RFC2821bis-01 Issue 3: EHLO parameter, Tony Finch, 00:42
March 28, 2007
- Re: RFC2821bis-01 Issue 3: EHLO parameter, Tony Hansen, 19:44
- Re: RFC2821bis-01 Issue 4: Client actions on receipt of 4yz and 5yz codes, Tony Hansen, 19:25
- Re: RFC2821bis-01 Issue 2: VRFY/EXPN, Tony Hansen, 19:23
- RFC2821bis-01 Issue 7: Use of 2119 definitions for conformity language (was: Re: 2821bis chapter 2), John C Klensin, 16:21
- Re: TINW was RFC2821b is-01 Issue 1: trailing dot in Domain, John C Klensin, 15:38
- Re: TINW was RFC2821b is-01 Issue 1: trailing dot in Domain, Arnt Gulbrandsen, 02:09
March 26, 2007
- Re: TINW was RFC2821b is-01 Issue 1: trailing dot in Domain, Tony Hansen, 21:40
- Re: RFC2821bis-01 Issue 5: Syntax of ID clause in Received trace header, Tony Finch, 07:42
- Re: [Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-klensin-rfc2821bis-01.txt], Hector Santos, 03:51
- Re: [Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-klensin-rfc2821bis-01.txt], Arnt Gulbrandsen, 02:42
- Re: [Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-klensin-rfc2821bis-01.txt], Hector Santos, 02:04
March 23, 2007
- Re: TINW was RFC2821b is-01 Issue 1: trailing dot in Domain (was: Re: domain name definition in RFC2821), Tony Hansen, 17:18
- TINW (was: RFC2821b is-01 Issue 1: trailing dot in Domain), Frank Ellermann, 14:47
- Re: RFC2821b is-01 Issue 1: trailing dot in Domain (was: Re: domain name definition in RFC2821), william(at)elan.net, 10:00
- Re: RFC2821bis-01 Issue 5: Syntax of ID clause in Received trace header, Paul Overell, 09:56
- Re: RFC2821b is-01 Issue 1: trailing dot in Domain (was: Re: domain name definition in RFC2821), Alex van den Bogaerdt, 09:49
- Re: RFC2821bis-01 Issue 5: Syntax of ID clause in Received trace header, Jeff Macdonald, 09:41
- RFC2821b is-01 Issue 1: trailing dot in Domain (was: Re: domain name definition in RFC2821), John C Klensin, 09:13
- Re: RFC2821bis-01 Issue 5: Syntax of ID clause in Received trace header, Frank Ellermann, 09:02
- RFC2821bis-01 Issue 0b: Deferred action on MAIL command argument (was: Re: [Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-klensin-rfc2821bis-01.txt]), John C Klensin, 08:48
- Re: domain name definition in RFC2821, Frank Ellermann, 08:32
- Re: domain name definition in RFC2821, Frank Ellermann, 08:28
- Re: [Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-klensin-rfc2821bis-01.txt], Frank Ellermann, 08:00
- Re: [Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-klensin-rfc2821bis-01.txt], Hector Santos, 06:55
- Re: [Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-klensin-rfc2821bis-01.txt], Arnt Gulbrandsen, 05:45
- Re: [Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-klensin-rfc2821bis-01.txt], Hector Santos, 05:18
- Re: Precedence error in RFC2821's ABNF, Tony Hansen, 04:02
- Re: [Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-klensin-rfc2821bis-01.txt], Tony Hansen, 04:02
- Precedence error in RFC2821's ABNF, Paul Overell, 03:21
- Re: RFC2821bis-01 Issue 5: Syntax of ID clause in Received trace header, Paul Overell, 03:05
- Re: RFC2821bis-01 Issue 5: Syntax of ID clause in Received trace header, Bill McQuillan, 00:58
March 22, 2007
- Re: domain name definition in RFC2821, Alex van den Bogaerdt, 23:44
- Re: RFC2821bis-01 Issue 5: Syntax of ID clause in Received trace header, william(at)elan.net, 23:04
- Re: RFC2821bis-01 Issue 3: EHLO parameter, Hector Santos, 21:25
- Re: domain name definition in RFC2821, Hector Santos, 20:34
- RFC2821bis-01 Issue 5: Syntax of ID clause in Received trace header, John C Klensin, 20:26
- RFC2821bis-01 Issue 3: EHLO parameter, John C Klensin, 20:20
- RFC2821bis-01 Issue 4: Client actions on receipt of 4yz and 5yz codes, John C Klensin, 20:17
- Known issues in rfc2821bis-01, John C Klensin, 20:17
- RFC2821bis-01 Issue 2: VRFY/EXPN, John C Klensin, 20:16
- Re: domain name definition in RFC2821, ned+ietf-smtp, 20:07
- Re: domain name definition in RFC2821, John C Klensin, 18:50
- Re: domain name definition in RFC2821, Frank Ellermann, 16:36
March 19, 2007
- Re: domain name definition in RFC2821, John C Klensin, 23:35
- Re: mail store vs. message store, Dave Crocker, 22:56
- Re: draft-hall-prdr-00, Claus Assmann, 22:48
- [spf-discuss] Re: domain name definition in RFC2821, Frank Ellermann, 18:49
- Re: mail store vs. message store, Tony Finch, 11:56
- Re: mail store vs. message store, Dave Crocker, 11:53
- Re: mail store vs. message store, Dave Crocker, 11:48
- Re: mail store vs. message store, Tony Finch, 10:57
- Re: mail store vs. message store, Eric A. Hall, 10:35
- Re: mail store vs. message store, Jim Fenton, 09:52
- mail store vs. message store, Dave Crocker, 07:12
March 14, 2007
- Re: ADMD, David MacQuigg, 15:27
- Re: ADMD, Frank Ellermann, 15:19
- Re: Is there any interest in reviving draft-lachman-laser-ldap-mail-routing-02.txt?, Eric A. Hall, 13:35
- Re: ADMD, Hector Santos, 11:19
- Re: ADMD, Dave Crocker, 11:05
- Re: ADMD, Frank Ellermann, 10:46
- Re: ADMD, David MacQuigg, 10:40
- Is there any interest in reviving draft-lachman-laser-ldap-mail-routing-02.txt?, Alexey Melnikov, 10:32
- Re: ADMD, Dave Crocker, 08:06
March 13, 2007
- Re: ADMD (was: Re: I-D ACTION:draft-crocker-email-arch-06.txt), ned+ietf-smtp, 17:00
- Re: ADMD (was: Re: I-D ACTION:draft-crocker-email-arch-06.txt), Valdis . Kletnieks, 16:00
- Re: ADMD (was: Re: I-D ACTION:draft-crocker-email-arch-06.txt), Tony Finch, 15:50
- Re: ADMD (was: Re: I-D ACTION:draft-crocker-email-arch-06.txt), ned+ietf-smtp, 15:03
- Re: ADMD (was: Re: I-D ACTION:draft-crocker-email-arch-06.txt), Tony Finch, 12:58
- Re: ADMD (was: Re: I-D ACTION:draft-crocker-email-arch-06.txt), David MacQuigg, 11:44
- Re: Conflicting Enhanced Status Codes between RFC 4468 and draft-siemborski-rfc2554bis, Frank Ellermann, 11:37
- Re: Conflicting Enhanced Status Codes between RFC 4468 and draft-siemborski-rfc2554bis, Alexey Melnikov, 09:42
- Re: Conflicting Enhanced Status Codes between RFC 4468 and draft-siemborski-rfc2554bis, Frank Ellermann, 09:17
March 12, 2007
- ADMD (was: Re: I-D ACTION:draft-crocker-email-arch-06.txt), Dave Crocker, 17:09
- Re: Conflicting Enhanced Status Codes between RFC 4468 and draft-siemborski-rfc2554bis, Tony Hansen, 17:09
- Re: Conflicting Enhanced Status Codes between RFC 4468 and draft-siemborski-rfc2554bis, John C Klensin, 09:51
- Re: Conflicting Enhanced Status Codes between RFC 4468 and draft-siemborski-rfc2554bis, Alexey Melnikov, 09:36
- Re: Conflicting Enhanced Status Codes between RFC 4468 and draft-siemborski-rfc2554bis, Tony Finch, 09:29
- Re: Conflicting Enhanced Status Codes between RFC 4468 and draft-siemborski-rfc2554bis, John C Klensin, 09:16
- Conflicting Enhanced Status Codes between RFC 4468 and draft-siemborski-rfc2554bis, Alexey Melnikov, 04:34
- Re: I-D ACTION:draft-crocker-email-arch-06.txt, David MacQuigg, 04:13
March 11, 2007
- Re: draft-hall-prdr-00, Eric A. Hall, 16:06
- Re: draft-hall-prdr-00, Matti Aarnio, 12:50
- draft-hall-prdr-00, Eric A. Hall, 12:01
- Re: [Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-crocker-email-arch-06.txt], Frank Ellermann, 10:36
- Re: [Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-crocker-email-arch-06.txt], Frank Ellermann, 10:35
- Re: [Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-crocker-email-arch-06.txt], ned+ietf-smtp, 08:41
- Re: [Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-crocker-email-arch-06.txt], Arnt Gulbrandsen, 05:12
March 09, 2007
- Re: [Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-crocker-email-arch-06.txt], Hector Santos, 19:22
- Re: [Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-crocker-email-arch-06.txt], Hector Santos, 18:24
- Re: [Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-crocker-email-arch-06.txt], Hector Santos, 18:15
- Re: [Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-crocker-email-arch-06.txt], ned+ietf-smtp, 15:16
- Re: [Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-crocker-email-arch-06.txt], Dave Crocker, 11:58
- Re: [Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-crocker-email-arch-06.txt], Valdis . Kletnieks, 11:46
- Re: [Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-crocker-email-arch-06.txt], Valdis . Kletnieks, 11:43
- Re: [Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-crocker-email-arch-06.txt], ned+ietf-smtp, 11:41
- Re: [Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-crocker-email-arch-06.txt], Tony Finch, 11:04
- Re: [Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-crocker-email-arch-06.txt], Valdis . Kletnieks, 10:56
- Re: [Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-crocker-email-arch-06.txt], Dave Crocker, 09:20
- Re: [Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-crocker-email-arch-06.txt], Arnt Gulbrandsen, 02:30
March 08, 2007
- Re: [Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-crocker-email-arch-06.txt], Dave Crocker, 21:42
- Re: [Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-crocker-email-arch-06.txt], Hector Santos, 19:23
- Re: [Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-crocker-email-arch-06.txt], Hector Santos, 19:10
- [Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-crocker-email-arch-06.txt], Dave Crocker, 18:04
- [Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-crocker-email-arch-06.txt], Dave Crocker, 18:03
- [Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-crocker-email-arch-06.txt], Dave Crocker, 17:41
- Re: [Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-klensin-rfc2821bis-01.txt], Hector Santos, 13:48
- {Blocked Content} [Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-klensin-rfc2821bis-01.txt], Tony Hansen, 09:37