[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-crocker-email-arch-06.txt]

2007-03-11 05:12:57

Frank Ellermann writes:
ned+ietf-smtp(_at_)mrochek(_dot_)com wrote:
This document is supposed to be documenting and explaining the formal architecture we have, not creating new formalisms on the fly.

I thought it's supposed to be a minimal abstraction of the architecture as it exists in common practice, not only the architecture as it's reflected in RFCs. Some RFCs reflecting the pre-spam email world like 2821 are putting it mildly harmful in an environment with 90% of all mail traffic considered as "unsolicited" (putting it again mildly).

Who needs a description of the old and known to be broken architecture ?

Those of us who STILL haven't moved to IM-2000 (or any other new and improved architecture).


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>