Frank Ellermann writes:
ned+ietf-smtp(_at_)mrochek(_dot_)com wrote:
This document is supposed to be documenting and explaining the
formal architecture we have, not creating new formalisms on the
fly.
I thought it's supposed to be a minimal abstraction of the
architecture as it exists in common practice, not only the
architecture as it's reflected in RFCs. Some RFCs reflecting the
pre-spam email world like 2821 are putting it mildly harmful in an
environment with 90% of all mail traffic considered as "unsolicited"
(putting it again mildly).
Who needs a description of the old and known to be broken architecture ?
Those of us who STILL haven't moved to IM-2000 (or any other new and
improved architecture).
Arnt