Tony Hansen wrote:
I had a few minutes. See attached. Comments?
o IANA is directed to create the registry Mail Enhanced Status
Codes. In the terms of [5], values of Enhanced Status Codes
must be registered with IANA under the IETF Consensus method.
Published RFC is IMO simpler, they can link to a RFC in the registry.
3. Security Considerations
There are no security considerations.
Maybe add "Conflicting status codes were found to be suboptimal" or
similar.
[1] Vaudreuil, G., "Enhanced Mail System Status Codes", RFC 1893,
January 1996.
Obsoleted by [2] (= RFC 3463), maybe move [1] to "informative" (?)
Do you need an "updates 1893" after 3463 already obsoleted 1893 ?
Now 2554bis needs a normative reference to your draft, and John
proposed to obsolete the conflicting code by two new codes in your
draft.
Frank