Re: RFC2821bis-01 Issue 5: Syntax of ID clause in Received trace header

In message <4603F5E9(_dot_)416C(_at_)xyzzy(_dot_)claranet(_dot_)de>, Frank Ellermann 
<nobody(_at_)xyzzy(_dot_)claranet(_dot_)de> writes
> Paul Overell wrote:

> > No need to remove it, as it is already consistent
> > with RFC2822.
> Maybe not exactly, 2821bis-01 says:
> |   String         = Atom / Quoted-string
Good point.

> Maybe replacing <String> by <Atom> is acceptable (?)
That would be compatible with RFC2822 and cover the non-message-id 
examples given.
ID  = CFWS "ID" FWS (Atom / msg-id)

Are there current implementations that require String?


Regards
--
Paul Overell         Internet Platform Development Manager, Thus plc

signature.asc
Description: PGP signature