Re: DATA, 221, and close (was: Re: RFC2821bis-01 Issue 8 number of messa

This example seems pretty hopelessly broken to me.   The "help"
response is particularly exciting, both for content and for
format.


OK, so does anybody have an idea what the wlist (white list?) command might do?

Boggle indeed.

                                Ned

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
Re: RFC2821bis-01 Issue 8 number of message transactions per connection ?, (continued) Re: RFC2821bis-01 Issue 8 number of message transactions per connection ?, Arnt Gulbrandsen Re: RFC2821bis-01 Issue 8 number of message transactions per connection ?, John C Klensin Re: RFC2821bis-01 Issue 8 number of message transactions per connection ?, Matti Aarnio Re: RFC2821bis-01 Issue 9: Requirements and limits table or equivalent, John C Klensin Re: RFC2821bis-01 Issue 8 number of message transactions per connection ?, Tony Hansen Re: RFC2821bis-01 Issue 8 number of message transactions per connection ?, Bart Schaefer Re: RFC2821bis-01 Issue 8 number of message transactions per connection ?, Bart Schaefer DATA, 221, and close (was: Re: RFC2821bis-01 Issue 8 number of message transactions per connection ?), John C Klensin Re: DATA, 221, and close (was: Re: RFC2821bis-01 Issue 8 number of message transactions per connection ?), Tony Finch Re: DATA, 221, and close (was: Re: RFC2821bis-01 Issue 8 number of message transactions per connection ?), John C Klensin Re: DATA, 221, and close (was: Re: RFC2821bis-01 Issue 8 number of message transactions per connection ?), ned+ietf-smtp <= Re: DATA, 221, and close (was: Re: RFC2821bis-01 Issue 8 number of message transactions per connection ?), Bart Schaefer Re: RFC2821bis-01 Issue 8 number of message transactions per connection ?, John C Klensin Re: RFC2821bis-01 Issue 8 number of message transactions per connection ?, Robert A. Rosenberg

Re: DATA, 221, and close (was: Re: RFC2821bis-01 Issue 8 number of message transactions per connection ?)