[Top] [All Lists]

Re: 2821bis: received: ... for clause

2007-06-14 00:51:25

sm(_at_)resistor(_dot_)net writes:
The implementations I've seen use the "for" only if there is one address. Isn't it already constrained to one mailbox?

Sort of. Sane implementations constrain it to one mailbox. Must not reveal bcc and so on and so forth.

I think my opinion is that since other concerns constrain it to one mailbox and the syntax is broken except in the single-mailbox case, the syntax should constrain it, too.