Re: What is the history of 2821 and implict MX?


John C Klensin wrote:

Use of WKS was explicitly deprecated


There is a trend in RFC 1123 wrt SMTP, oversimplification.

"Simply try to use a service to see if it's there" is not
so simple when that can take about 100 hours in 2821bis.

 Frank

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
Re: current usage of AAAA implicit MX?, (continued) Re: current usage of AAAA implicit MX?, Arnt Gulbrandsen Lost DSNs (was: current usage of AAAA implicit MX?), Frank Ellermann Re: current usage of AAAA implicit MX?, ned+ietf-smtp What is the history of 2821 and implict MX?, Pete Resnick Re: What is the history of 2821 and implict MX?, Hector Santos Re: What is the history of 2821 and implict MX?, Pete Resnick Re: What is the history of 2821 and implict MX?, Hector Santos Re: What is the history of 2821 and implict MX?, Pete Resnick Re: What is the history of 2821 and implict MX?, Robert A. Rosenberg Re: What is the history of 2821 and implict MX?, John C Klensin Re: What is the history of 2821 and implict MX?, Frank Ellermann <= Re: What is the history of 2821 and implict MX?, Robert A. Rosenberg Re: What is the history of 2821 and implict MX?, John C Klensin SMTP Service Advertisement, John Leslie Re: What is the history of 2821 and implict MX?, John C Klensin Re: What is the history of 2821 and implict MX?, Glenn Anderson Re: current usage of AAAA implicit MX?, Hector Santos Re: current usage of AAAA implicit MX?, Mark Andrews Re: current usage of AAAA implicit MX?, Douglas Otis Re: current usage of AAAA implicit MX?, Hector Santos Re: current usage of AAAA implicit MX?, Douglas Otis