Re: current usage of AAAA implicit MX?

Dave Crocker writes:
> A side discussion about history might be interesting, but I'll suggest 
> that it should not really be a factor for the current discussion.  
> The reasons are:
> 1. It has a substantial installed base of use now.
Reason enough for me.

> 3. It is not generally recognized as causing any problems now.
I concede that most people don't think lost DSNs are a significant problem.

Arnt