[Top] [All Lists]

Re: current usage of AAAA implicit MX?

2008-04-05 12:47:27
On 2008-04-04 17:30:29 -0400, Robert A. Rosenberg wrote:
At 12:56 -0400 on 04/04/2008, Tony Hansen wrote about Re: current 
usage of AAAA implicit MX?:

These questions are intended to find out what current IPv6 deployments
do in these situations. When an MX is not found, are they already
looking for both A and AAAA records, or are they only looking for A
records. Are they following RFC 3974 or not? What's the installed base
already doing?

RFC 3974 talks about Dual Stack set-ups and what an IPv4-Only Server 
should do when presented with a Mixed MX or an MX that only points at 
IPv6 AAAA records. It, BTW, REQUIRES an MX if there are any IPv6 MTAs 
and only supports A-Fallback in the absence of an MX


(ie: It does NOT define any attempt to look for AAAA records in the
absence of an MX after/before checking for A records).

Yes, it does:

|   (1)  Lookup the MX record for the destination domain.
|        If NODATA (i.e., empty answer with NOERROR(0) RCODE) is
|        returned, there is no MX record but the name is valid.  Assume
|        that there is a record like "name.  IN MX 0 name." (implicit MX)
|        and go to step (3).  
|   (3)  If the sending MTA has IPv4 capability, lookup the A records.
|        Keep the resulting addresses until step (5).
|   (4)  If the sending MTA has IPv6 capability, lookup the AAAA records.

Both A and AAAA records are looked up for the implicit MX.

It also states that in the presence of an MX containing IPv6 address 
references, an IPv4-Only stack should ignore the IPv6 addresses

Yes, of course. It cannot reach them anyway. Just as IPv6-only hosts can
ignore A records since they cannot reach them either.

and only use the IPv4 addresses (and in a IPv6-Only MX to NOT do
IPv4-A-Record fallback).

Where do you read that? 


   _  | Peter J. Holzer    | It took a genius to create [TeX],
|_|_) | Sysadmin WSR       | and it takes a genius to maintain it.
| |   | hjp(_at_)hjp(_dot_)at         | That's not engineering, that's art.
__/   | |    -- David Kastrup in comp.text.tex

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature