IETF SMTP (thread)
Re: I-D Action:draft-klensin-rfc2821bis-10.txt,
Tony Hansen,
2008/04/15
- Re: I-D Action:draft-klensin-rfc2821bis-10.txt, Arnt Gulbrandsen, 2008/04/15
- Re: I-D Action:draft-klensin-rfc2821bis-10.txt, SM, 2008/04/15
- Re: I-D Action:draft-klensin-rfc2821bis-10.txt, Arnt Gulbrandsen, 2008/04/15
- Re: I-D Action:draft-klensin-rfc2821bis-10.txt, SM, 2008/04/15
- Re: I-D Action:draft-klensin-rfc2821bis-10.txt, Arnt Gulbrandsen, 2008/04/15
- Re: I-D Action:draft-klensin-rfc2821bis-10.txt, Hector Santos, 2008/04/15
- Re: I-D Action:draft-klensin-rfc2821bis-10.txt, John Leslie, 2008/04/15
- Re: I-D Action:draft-klensin-rfc2821bis-10.txt, Hector Santos, 2008/04/15
- Re: I-D Action:draft-klensin-rfc2821bis-10.txt, John Leslie, 2008/04/16
- Re: I-D Action:draft-klensin-rfc2821bis-10.txt, Keith Moore, 2008/04/15
- Re: I-D Action:draft-klensin-rfc2821bis-10.txt, Tony Finch, 2008/04/16
- Re: I-D Action:draft-klensin-rfc2821bis-10.txt, ned+ietf-smtp, 2008/04/16
- Re: I-D Action:draft-klensin-rfc2821bis-10.txt, Tony Finch, 2008/04/16
- IPv6 addresses and IPv4 hosts (was: Re: I-D Action:draft-klensin-rfc2821bis-10.txt), John C Klensin, 2008/04/16
- Re: IPv6 addresses and IPv4 hosts (was: Re: I-D Action:draft-klensin-rfc2821bis-10.txt), Arnt Gulbrandsen, 2008/04/17
- Re: IPv6 addresses and IPv4 hosts, Hector Santos, 2008/04/17
- Re: IPv6 addresses and IPv4 hosts, John C Klensin, 2008/04/17
- Re: IPv6 addresses and IPv4 hosts, Hector Santos, 2008/04/17
- Re: IPv6 addresses and IPv4 hosts (was: Re: I-D Action:draft-klensin-rfc2821bis-10.txt), John Leslie, 2008/04/17
- IPv4 / IPv6 interaction, John Leslie, 2008/04/16
- Re: I-D Action:draft-klensin-rfc2821bis-10.txt, Willie Gillespie, 2008/04/16
- Re: I-D Action:draft-klensin-rfc2821bis-10.txt, John C Klensin, 2008/04/16
- Re: I-D Action:draft-klensin-rfc2821bis-10.txt, Alex van den Bogaerdt, 2008/04/21
- Re: I-D Action:draft-klensin-rfc2821bis-10.txt, Tony Finch, 2008/04/17
- Re: I-D Action:draft-klensin-rfc2821bis-10.txt, John C Klensin, 2008/04/17
- Re: I-D Action:draft-klensin-rfc2821bis-10.txt, Tony Finch, 2008/04/17
- Re: I-D Action:draft-klensin-rfc2821bis-10.txt, John C Klensin, 2008/04/17
- Re: I-D Action:draft-klensin-rfc2821bis-10.txt, Arnt Gulbrandsen, 2008/04/17
- Re: I-D Action:draft-klensin-rfc2821bis-10.txt, John C Klensin, 2008/04/17
- Re: I-D Action:draft-klensin-rfc2821bis-10.txt, Keith Moore, 2008/04/17
- Re: I-D Action:draft-klensin-rfc2821bis-10.txt, John Leslie, 2008/04/17
- Re: I-D Action:draft-klensin-rfc2821bis-10.txt, Keith Moore, 2008/04/17
- Re: I-D Action:draft-klensin-rfc2821bis-10.txt, SM, 2008/04/17
- Re: I-D Action:draft-klensin-rfc2821bis-10.txt, Hector Santos, 2008/04/17
- Re: I-D Action:draft-klensin-rfc2821bis-10.txt, Keith Moore, 2008/04/17
- Re: I-D Action:draft-klensin-rfc2821bis-10.txt, Tony Finch, 2008/04/17
- Re: I-D Action:draft-klensin-rfc2821bis-10.txt, Keith Moore, 2008/04/17
- Re: I-D Action:draft-klensin-rfc2821bis-10.txt, Tony Finch, 2008/04/17
- Re: I-D Action:draft-klensin-rfc2821bis-10.txt, Keith Moore, 2008/04/17
- Re: I-D Action:draft-klensin-rfc2821bis-10.txt, Tony Finch, 2008/04/17
- Re: I-D Action:draft-klensin-rfc2821bis-10.txt, Keith Moore, 2008/04/17
- Re: I-D Action:draft-klensin-rfc2821bis-10.txt, Paul Smith, 2008/04/17
- Re: I-D Action:draft-klensin-rfc2821bis-10.txt, Tony Finch, 2008/04/18
- Re: I-D Action:draft-klensin-rfc2821bis-10.txt, Douglas Otis, 2008/04/18
- Re: I-D Action:draft-klensin-rfc2821bis-10.txt, Willie Gillespie, 2008/04/18
- Re: I-D Action:draft-klensin-rfc2821bis-10.txt, Hector Santos, 2008/04/19
- Re: I-D Action:draft-klensin-rfc2821bis-10.txt, Robert A. Rosenberg, 2008/04/23
- Re: I-D Action:draft-klensin-rfc2821bis-10.txt, Arnt Gulbrandsen, 2008/04/24
- Re: I-D Action:draft-klensin-rfc2821bis-10.txt, Peter J. Holzer, 2008/04/24
- Re: I-D Action:draft-klensin-rfc2821bis-10.txt, Paul Smith, 2008/04/25
- Re: I-D Action:draft-klensin-rfc2821bis-10.txt, Hector Santos, 2008/04/25
- Re: I-D Action:draft-klensin-rfc2821bis-10.txt, Tony Finch, 2008/04/25
- Re: I-D Action:draft-klensin-rfc2821bis-10.txt, Arnt Gulbrandsen, 2008/04/25
- Re: I-D Action:draft-klensin-rfc2821bis-10.txt, Tony Finch, 2008/04/25
- Re: I-D Action:draft-klensin-rfc2821bis-10.txt, Arnt Gulbrandsen, 2008/04/25
- Re: I-D Action:draft-klensin-rfc2821bis-10.txt, Frank Ellermann, 2008/04/25
- Re: I-D Action:draft-klensin-rfc2821bis-10.txt, Alessandro Vesely, 2008/04/25
- Re: I-D Action:draft-klensin-rfc2821bis-10.txt, Frank Ellermann, 2008/04/25
- Re: I-D Action:draft-klensin-rfc2821bis-10.txt, Alessandro Vesely, 2008/04/26
- Re: I-D Action:draft-klensin-rfc2821bis-10.txt, Peter J. Holzer, 2008/04/25
- Re: I-D Action:draft-klensin-rfc2821bis-10.txt, Robert A. Rosenberg, 2008/04/24
- Re: I-D Action:draft-klensin-rfc2821bis-10.txt, Hector Santos, 2008/04/24
- Re: I-D Action:draft-klensin-rfc2821bis-10.txt, Arnt Gulbrandsen, 2008/04/25
- Re: I-D Action:draft-klensin-rfc2821bis-10.txt, Hector Santos, 2008/04/25
- Re: I-D Action:draft-klensin-rfc2821bis-10.txt, Paul Smith, 2008/04/25
- Re: I-D Action:draft-klensin-rfc2821bis-10.txt, Hector Santos, 2008/04/25
- Re: I-D Action:draft-klensin-rfc2821bis-10.txt, Douglas Otis, 2008/04/25
- Message not available
- IPv6 considerations (was: I-D Action:draft-klensin-rfc2821bis-10.txt), Frank Ellermann, 2008/04/19
- Re: I-D Action:draft-klensin-rfc2821bis-10.txt, Lisa Dusseault, 2008/04/18
- Re: I-D Action:draft-klensin-rfc2821bis-10.txt, Keith Moore, 2008/04/18
- Re: I-D Action:draft-klensin-rfc2821bis-10.txt, Hector Santos, 2008/04/18
- Sheep look up (was: I-D Action:draft-klensin-rfc2821bis-10.txt), Frank Ellermann, 2008/04/19
- Re: I-D Action:draft-klensin-rfc2821bis-10.txt, Robert A. Rosenberg, 2008/04/17
- Re: I-D Action:draft-klensin-rfc2821bis-10.txt, Hector Santos, 2008/04/17
- Block IPv6-only at the border (was: I-D Action:draft-klensin-rfc2821bis-10.txt), Frank Ellermann, 2008/04/16
- Re: Block IPv6-only at the border (was: I-D Action:draft-klensin-rfc2821bis-10.txt), Sabahattin Gucukoglu, 2008/04/16
- Re: Block IPv6-only at the border (was: I-D Action:draft-klensin-rfc2821bis-10.txt), John C Klensin, 2008/04/16
- Re: Block IPv6-only at the border, Frank Ellermann, 2008/04/16
RFC2821bis-09: Lines and Submission,
Sabahattin Gucukoglu,
2008/04/12
- Re: RFC2821bis-09: Lines and Submission, John C Klensin, 2008/04/12
- Re: RFC2821bis-09: Lines and Submission, Sabahattin Gucukoglu, 2008/04/12
- Re: RFC2821bis-09: Lines and Submission, Frank Ellermann, 2008/04/12
- Re: RFC2821bis-09: Lines and Submission, John C Klensin, 2008/04/12
- Re: RFC2821bis-09: Lines and Submission, Frank Ellermann, 2008/04/13
- Re: RFC2821bis-09: Lines and Submission, Hector Santos, 2008/04/13
- Re: RFC2821bis-09: Lines and Submission, ned+ietf-smtp, 2008/04/14
- Re: RFC2821bis-09: Lines and Submission, Frank Ellermann, 2008/04/14
Mixed Return Codes,
Hector Santos,
2008/04/11
- Re: Mixed Return Codes - CORECTION, Hector Santos, 2008/04/11
- RE: Mixed Return Codes, MH Michael Hammer (5304), 2008/04/11
- Re: Mixed Return Codes, Frank Ellermann, 2008/04/11
- Requiring PTR, Hector Santos, 2008/04/12
- Re: Requiring PTR, SM, 2008/04/12
- Re: Requiring PTR, Carl S. Gutekunst, 2008/04/12
- Re: Requiring PTR, Robert A. Rosenberg, 2008/04/14
- Re: Requiring PTR, Carl S. Gutekunst, 2008/04/14
- Re: Requiring PTR, Hector Santos, 2008/04/15
- Re: Requiring PTR, Peter Bowyer, 2008/04/15
- Re: Requiring PTR, Sabahattin Gucukoglu, 2008/04/12
- Re: Requiring PTR, Hector Santos, 2008/04/13
- Re: Requiring PTR, Hector Santos, 2008/04/14
- Re: Requiring PTR, Robert A. Rosenberg, 2008/04/14
- Re: Requiring PTR, Frank Ellermann, 2008/04/12
How does SMTP IPv4 and IPv6 work together,
Hector Santos,
2008/04/05
- Re: How does SMTP IPv4 and IPv6 work together, Robert A. Rosenberg, 2008/04/05
- Re: How does SMTP IPv4 and IPv6 work together, Hector Santos, 2008/04/06
- Re: How does SMTP IPv4 and IPv6 work together, Robert A. Rosenberg, 2008/04/06
- Re: How does SMTP IPv4 and IPv6 work together, Hector Santos, 2008/04/06
- Re: How does SMTP IPv4 and IPv6 work together, Robert A. Rosenberg, 2008/04/07
- Re: How does SMTP IPv4 and IPv6 work together, Robert A. Rosenberg, 2008/04/06
- Re: How does SMTP IPv4 and IPv6 work together, Hector Santos, 2008/04/06
- Re: How does SMTP IPv4 and IPv6 work together, Robert A. Rosenberg, 2008/04/07
There is at least one email server without MX RR but AAAA RR we all know,
Michael Storz,
2008/04/04
- Re: There is at least one email server without MX RR but AAAA RR we all know, Willie Gillespie, 2008/04/04
- Re: There is at least one email server without MX RR but AAAA RR we all know, John Levine, 2008/04/04
- Re: There is at least one email server without MX RR but AAAA RR we all know, Paul Hoffman, 2008/04/04
- Re: There is at least one email server without MX RR but AAAA RR we all know, Alex van den Bogaerdt, 2008/04/04
- Re: There is at least one email server without MX RR but AAAA RR we all know, Michael Storz, 2008/04/04
- Re: There is at least one email server without MX RR but AAAA RR we all know, Arnt Gulbrandsen, 2008/04/04
- Re: There is at least one email server without MX RR but AAAA RR we all know, Peter J. Holzer, 2008/04/04
- Re: There is at least one email server without MX RR but AAAA RR we all know, SM, 2008/04/04
- Re: There is at least one email server without MX RR but AAAA RR we all know, Mark Andrews, 2008/04/04
current usage of AAAA implicit MX?,
Tony Hansen,
2008/04/03
- Re: current usage of AAAA implicit MX?, Mark Andrews, 2008/04/03
- Re: current usage of AAAA implicit MX?, Paul Smith, 2008/04/04
- Re: current usage of AAAA implicit MX?, Michael Storz, 2008/04/04
- Re: current usage of AAAA implicit MX?, Dave Crocker, 2008/04/04
- Re: current usage of AAAA implicit MX?, Tony Hansen, 2008/04/04
- Re: current usage of AAAA implicit MX?, Dave Crocker, 2008/04/04
- Re: current usage of AAAA implicit MX?, Dave Crocker, 2008/04/04
- Re: current usage of AAAA implicit MX?, Robert A. Rosenberg, 2008/04/04
- Re: current usage of AAAA implicit MX?, John Levine, 2008/04/04
- Re: current usage of AAAA implicit MX?, Peter J. Holzer, 2008/04/05
- Re: current usage of AAAA implicit MX?, Robert A. Rosenberg, 2008/04/04
- Re: current usage of AAAA implicit MX?, Peter J. Holzer, 2008/04/05
- Re: current usage of AAAA implicit MX?, Arnt Gulbrandsen, 2008/04/05
- Re: current usage of AAAA implicit MX?, Peter J. Holzer, 2008/04/05
- Re: current usage of AAAA implicit MX?, Robert A. Rosenberg, 2008/04/05
- Re: current usage of AAAA implicit MX?, Hector Santos, 2008/04/05
- Re: current usage of AAAA implicit MX?, Russ Allbery, 2008/04/05
- Re: current usage of AAAA implicit MX?, Hector Santos, 2008/04/05
- Re: current usage of AAAA implicit MX?, Robert A. Rosenberg, 2008/04/06
- Re: current usage of AAAA implicit MX?, John C Klensin, 2008/04/07
- Re: current usage of AAAA implicit MX?, Dave Crocker, 2008/04/07
- Re: current usage of AAAA implicit MX?, Arnt Gulbrandsen, 2008/04/07
- Lost DSNs (was: current usage of AAAA implicit MX?), Frank Ellermann, 2008/04/07
- Re: current usage of AAAA implicit MX?, ned+ietf-smtp, 2008/04/07
- What is the history of 2821 and implict MX?, Pete Resnick, 2008/04/07
- Re: What is the history of 2821 and implict MX?, Hector Santos, 2008/04/07
- Re: What is the history of 2821 and implict MX?, Pete Resnick, 2008/04/07
- Re: What is the history of 2821 and implict MX?, Hector Santos, 2008/04/07
- Re: What is the history of 2821 and implict MX?, Pete Resnick, 2008/04/08
- Re: What is the history of 2821 and implict MX?, Robert A. Rosenberg, 2008/04/09
- Re: What is the history of 2821 and implict MX?, John C Klensin, 2008/04/09
- Re: What is the history of 2821 and implict MX?, Frank Ellermann, 2008/04/09
- Re: What is the history of 2821 and implict MX?, Robert A. Rosenberg, 2008/04/10
- Re: What is the history of 2821 and implict MX?, John C Klensin, 2008/04/11
- SMTP Service Advertisement, John Leslie, 2008/04/11
- Re: What is the history of 2821 and implict MX?, John C Klensin, 2008/04/07
- Re: What is the history of 2821 and implict MX?, Glenn Anderson, 2008/04/07
- Re: current usage of AAAA implicit MX?, Hector Santos, 2008/04/07
- Re: current usage of AAAA implicit MX?, Mark Andrews, 2008/04/07
- Re: current usage of AAAA implicit MX?, Douglas Otis, 2008/04/07
- Re: current usage of AAAA implicit MX?, Hector Santos, 2008/04/08
- Re: current usage of AAAA implicit MX?, Douglas Otis, 2008/04/08
- Re: current usage of AAAA implicit MX?, Hector Santos, 2008/04/09
- Re: current usage of AAAA implicit MX?, Robert A. Rosenberg, 2008/04/07
- Re: current usage of AAAA implicit MX?, Robert A. Rosenberg, 2008/04/05
- Re: current usage of AAAA implicit MX?, Russ Allbery, 2008/04/06
- Re: current usage of AAAA implicit MX?, Hector Santos, 2008/04/06
- Re: current usage of AAAA implicit MX?, Robert A. Rosenberg, 2008/04/06
- Re: current usage of AAAA implicit MX?, Russ Allbery, 2008/04/07
- Re: current usage of AAAA implicit MX?, Hector Santos, 2008/04/08
- Re: current usage of AAAA implicit MX?, Russ Allbery, 2008/04/08
- Re: current usage of AAAA implicit MX?, Arnt Gulbrandsen, 2008/04/06
- Re: current usage of AAAA implicit MX?, Robert A. Rosenberg, 2008/04/05
- Re: current usage of AAAA implicit MX?, Tony Hansen, 2008/04/04
- Re: current usage of AAAA implicit MX?, Peter J. Holzer, 2008/04/04
- Re: current usage of AAAA implicit MX?, Arnt Gulbrandsen, 2008/04/04
Scope Creep,
John Leslie,
2008/04/01
- Re: Scope Creep, Dave Crocker, 2008/04/01
- Re: Scope Creep, John Leslie, 2008/04/01
- Re: Scope Creep, Arnt Gulbrandsen, 2008/04/02
- Registration model, 2821bis-06, Arnt Gulbrandsen, 2008/04/02
- Re: Registration model, 2821bis-06, Derek J. Balling, 2008/04/02
- Re: Registration model, 2821bis-06, Arnt Gulbrandsen, 2008/04/02
- Re: Registration model, 2821bis-06, Keith Moore, 2008/04/02
- Re: Registration model, 2821bis-06, Arnt Gulbrandsen, 2008/04/02
- Re: Registration model, 2821bis-06, Peter J. Holzer, 2008/04/03
- Re: Registration model, 2821bis-06, Keith Moore, 2008/04/03
- Re: Registration model, 2821bis-06, Frank Ellermann, 2008/04/04
- Re: Registration model, 2821bis-06, Dave Crocker, 2008/04/02
- Re: Registration model, 2821bis-06, Keith Moore, 2008/04/02
- Re: Registration model, 2821bis-06, Arnt Gulbrandsen, 2008/04/02
- Re: Registration model, 2821bis-06, Dave Crocker, 2008/04/02
- Re: Registration model, 2821bis-06, Arnt Gulbrandsen, 2008/04/02
- Re: Registration model, 2821bis-06, ned+ietf-smtp, 2008/04/02
- Re: Registration model, 2821bis-06, John C Klensin, 2008/04/02
- Re: Registration model, 2821bis-06, Arnt Gulbrandsen, 2008/04/02
- Re: Registration model, 2821bis-06, Michael Storz, 2008/04/03
- Re: Registration model, 2821bis-06, Bill McQuillan, 2008/04/03
- Re: Registration model, 2821bis-06, Hector Santos, 2008/04/03
- Re: Registration model, 2821bis-06, SM, 2008/04/02
- Re: Registration model, 2821bis-06, Arnt Gulbrandsen, 2008/04/02
- Re: Scope Creep, Michael Storz, 2008/04/02
- Re: Scope Creep, Keith Moore, 2008/04/02
- Re: Scope Creep, Arnt Gulbrandsen, 2008/04/02
- Re: Scope Creep, Michael Storz, 2008/04/02
- Re: Scope Creep, Robert A. Rosenberg, 2008/04/02
- Re: Scope Creep, Lisa Dusseault, 2008/04/02
- Re: Scope Creep, John C Klensin, 2008/04/02
- Re: Scope Creep, Dave Crocker, 2008/04/02
- Implicit MXs - asking the question more clearly (was: Re: Scope Creep), John C Klensin, 2008/04/05
- Re: Scope Creep, Lisa Dusseault, 2008/04/02
- Re: Scope Creep, ned+ietf-smtp, 2008/04/02
Re: Minor is. It's not a pardigm change,
Arnt Gulbrandsen,
2008/04/01
- Re: Minor is. It's not a pardigm change, Sabahattin Gucukoglu, 2008/04/01
- Re: Minor is. It's not a pardigm change, Robert A. Rosenberg, 2008/04/01
- Re: Minor is. It's not a pardigm change, John C Klensin, 2008/04/05
- Re: Minor is. It's not a pardigm change, Bill McQuillan, 2008/04/05
- Re: Minor is. It's not a pardigm change, Peter J. Holzer, 2008/04/05
- Re: Minor is. It's not a pardigm change, Robert A. Rosenberg, 2008/04/05
- Re: Minor is. It's not a pardigm change, Hector Santos, 2008/04/06
- Re: Minor is. It's not a pardigm change, Hector Santos, 2008/04/06
- Re: Minor is. It's not a pardigm change, Robert A. Rosenberg, 2008/04/06
- Re: Minor is. It's not a pardigm change, Hector Santos, 2008/04/07
- Re: Minor is. It's not a pardigm change, Robert A. Rosenberg, 2008/04/06
- Re: Minor is. It's not a pardigm change, Dave Crocker, 2008/04/02