Re: Registration model, 2821bis-06
2008-04-02 06:05:29
Keith Moore writes:
Arnt Gulbrandsen wrote:
How many people would be happy if 5.1 were to say this?
...
- even if a client doesn't use AAAA records for synthesising MX
records, it MAY use them for delivering mail once an MX has
been synthesised.
third rule is a bad idea, IMHO.
I don't mind dropping that. I put it in because I think it's a
defensible reading of 2821. But IMO it's an extremely unimportant case,
so I don't really care either way.
Arnt
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- Re: Scope Creep, (continued)
- Re: Scope Creep, Dave Crocker
- Re: Scope Creep, Arnt Gulbrandsen
- Re: Registration model, 2821bis-06, Keith Moore
- Re: Registration model, 2821bis-06,
Arnt Gulbrandsen <=
- Re: Registration model, 2821bis-06, Peter J. Holzer
- Re: Registration model, 2821bis-06, Keith Moore
- Re: Registration model, 2821bis-06, Frank Ellermann
- Re: Registration model, 2821bis-06, Dave Crocker
- Re: Registration model, 2821bis-06, Keith Moore
- Re: Registration model, 2821bis-06, Arnt Gulbrandsen
- Re: Registration model, 2821bis-06, Dave Crocker
- Re: Registration model, 2821bis-06, Arnt Gulbrandsen
- Re: Registration model, 2821bis-06, ned+ietf-smtp
- Re: Registration model, 2821bis-06, John C Klensin
|
|
|