Re: Registration model, 2821bis-06
2008-04-02 09:19:51
Dave,
fixing bugs in the mail specifications is entirely in scope for the
current effort.
Keith
Dave Crocker wrote:
Arnt Gulbrandsen wrote:
How many people would be happy if 5.1 were to say this?
- if there is no MX record, but there is an A, then the sending
host MUST synthesise an MX
-1
Difficult to see how much more completely it can be explained that this
is out of scope for the current effort.
d/
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- Re: Scope Creep, (continued)
- Re: Scope Creep, Arnt Gulbrandsen
- Re: Registration model, 2821bis-06, Keith Moore
- Re: Registration model, 2821bis-06, Arnt Gulbrandsen
- Re: Registration model, 2821bis-06, Peter J. Holzer
- Re: Registration model, 2821bis-06, Keith Moore
- Re: Registration model, 2821bis-06, Frank Ellermann
- Re: Registration model, 2821bis-06, Dave Crocker
- Re: Registration model, 2821bis-06,
Keith Moore <=
- Re: Registration model, 2821bis-06, Arnt Gulbrandsen
- Re: Registration model, 2821bis-06, Dave Crocker
- Re: Registration model, 2821bis-06, Arnt Gulbrandsen
- Re: Registration model, 2821bis-06, ned+ietf-smtp
- Re: Registration model, 2821bis-06, John C Klensin
- Re: Registration model, 2821bis-06, Arnt Gulbrandsen
- Re: Registration model, 2821bis-06, Michael Storz
- Re: Registration model, 2821bis-06, Bill McQuillan
- Re: Registration model, 2821bis-06, Hector Santos
- Re: Registration model, 2821bis-06, SM
|
|
|