Re: Registration model, 2821bis-06
2008-04-02 10:47:36
Dave Crocker writes:
Since there have already been quite a few postings, by several
different people, that explained this, it looks like a review of the
archive is in order.
I have read all the postings. I suppose you tried to explain when you
said that the A rule is a basic feature. But you didn't explain why
extending this basic feature is beneficial, or why this basic feature
is good. Could you do so?
Arnt
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- Re: Registration model, 2821bis-06, (continued)
- Re: Registration model, 2821bis-06, Arnt Gulbrandsen
- Re: Registration model, 2821bis-06, Keith Moore
- Re: Registration model, 2821bis-06, Arnt Gulbrandsen
- Re: Registration model, 2821bis-06, Peter J. Holzer
- Re: Registration model, 2821bis-06, Keith Moore
- Re: Registration model, 2821bis-06, Frank Ellermann
- Re: Registration model, 2821bis-06, Dave Crocker
- Re: Registration model, 2821bis-06, Keith Moore
- Re: Registration model, 2821bis-06, Arnt Gulbrandsen
- Re: Registration model, 2821bis-06, Dave Crocker
- Re: Registration model, 2821bis-06,
Arnt Gulbrandsen <=
- Re: Registration model, 2821bis-06, ned+ietf-smtp
- Re: Registration model, 2821bis-06, John C Klensin
- Re: Registration model, 2821bis-06, Arnt Gulbrandsen
- Re: Registration model, 2821bis-06, Michael Storz
- Re: Registration model, 2821bis-06, Bill McQuillan
- Re: Registration model, 2821bis-06, Hector Santos
- Re: Registration model, 2821bis-06, SM
- Re: Registration model, 2821bis-06, Arnt Gulbrandsen
- Re: Scope Creep, Michael Storz
- Re: Scope Creep, Keith Moore
|
|
|