Tony Finch writes:
On Thu, 17 Apr 2008, John C Klensin wrote:
And, unless I misread your note, I think that puts us in violent agreement.
Yes :-)
(Assuming that by "lower priority MX" you mean higher-numbered.)
I agree too. IPv6 sites have to have MXes and be IPv4-reachable somehow.
I still can't understand why so many people here think an AAAA should suffice.
Arnt