At 02:25 -0400 on 04/07/2008, Hector Santos wrote about Re: How does
SMTP IPv4 and IPv6 work together:
Robert A. Rosenberg wrote:
At 02:51 -0400 on 04/06/2008, Hector Santos wrote about Re: How
does SMTP IPv4 and IPv6 work together:
So this is why I believe that the only text that is necessary at this
point for 2821bis is:
IPv6 senders connecting to IPv4 systems MUST be aware that IPv4
systems are ignorant of IPv6 technology and therefore SHOULD
make it possible to comply with IPv4 SMTP expectations to allow
for responses. This implies that IPv6 senders sending mail to
IPv6 SHOULD|MUST have explicit MX records or implicit MX A
record at a minimum.
I have removed all of the rest of your message and left only the
above. Make that SHOULD|MUST just SHOULD (and add "pointing at A
and and optionally AAAA records" after the "explicit MX records"
clause) and the issue is solved since only these combinations are
valid:
Should that "sending mail to IPv6" not read "sending mail to IPv4"?
Yes, it was a typo, corrected with your suggested changes:
IPv6 senders connecting to IPv4 systems MUST be aware that IPv4
systems are ignorant of IPv6 technology and therefore SHOULD
make it possible to comply with IPv4 SMTP expectations to allow
for responses. This implies that IPv6 senders sending mail to
IPv4 SHOULD have explicit MX records pointing at A and
optionally AAAA records.
I am not sure I like the last sentence since the AAAA record is
meaningless to IPv4 only aware SMTP nodes.
How about:
.... This implies that IPv6 senders sending mail to
IPv4 SHOULD have A records resulting from explicit MX
queries.
How about "... pointing at A and optionally AAAA records (to allow
the IPv6 MTA to talk to IPv6-Only MTAs)"? This preserves and explains
the MX->AAAA section. Thus IPv4 would/could be preferred for Dual
Stack Receivers while still supporting both IPv4-Only and IPv6-Only
receivers.
--
Sincerely
Hector Santos, CTO
http://www.santronics.com
http://santronics.blogspot.com
!3a-) Happy.gif
Description: GIF image