Re: I-D Action:draft-klensin-rfc2821bis-10.txt
2008-04-25 10:07:58
Tony Finch writes:
All other types of messages (i.e., any message which is not
required by a standards-track RFC to have a null reverse-path)
SHOULD be sent with with a valid, non-null reverse-path.
My bad.
Arnt
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- Re: I-D Action:draft-klensin-rfc2821bis-10.txt, (continued)
- Re: I-D Action:draft-klensin-rfc2821bis-10.txt, Willie Gillespie
- Re: I-D Action:draft-klensin-rfc2821bis-10.txt, Hector Santos
- Re: I-D Action:draft-klensin-rfc2821bis-10.txt, Robert A. Rosenberg
- Re: I-D Action:draft-klensin-rfc2821bis-10.txt, Arnt Gulbrandsen
- Re: I-D Action:draft-klensin-rfc2821bis-10.txt, Peter J. Holzer
- Re: I-D Action:draft-klensin-rfc2821bis-10.txt, Paul Smith
- Re: I-D Action:draft-klensin-rfc2821bis-10.txt, Hector Santos
- Re: I-D Action:draft-klensin-rfc2821bis-10.txt, Tony Finch
- Re: I-D Action:draft-klensin-rfc2821bis-10.txt, Arnt Gulbrandsen
- Re: I-D Action:draft-klensin-rfc2821bis-10.txt, Tony Finch
- Re: I-D Action:draft-klensin-rfc2821bis-10.txt,
Arnt Gulbrandsen <=
- Re: I-D Action:draft-klensin-rfc2821bis-10.txt, Frank Ellermann
- Re: I-D Action:draft-klensin-rfc2821bis-10.txt, Alessandro Vesely
- Re: I-D Action:draft-klensin-rfc2821bis-10.txt, Frank Ellermann
- Re: I-D Action:draft-klensin-rfc2821bis-10.txt, Alessandro Vesely
- Re: I-D Action:draft-klensin-rfc2821bis-10.txt, Peter J. Holzer
- Re: I-D Action:draft-klensin-rfc2821bis-10.txt, Robert A. Rosenberg
- Re: I-D Action:draft-klensin-rfc2821bis-10.txt, Hector Santos
- Re: I-D Action:draft-klensin-rfc2821bis-10.txt, Arnt Gulbrandsen
- Re: I-D Action:draft-klensin-rfc2821bis-10.txt, Hector Santos
- Re: I-D Action:draft-klensin-rfc2821bis-10.txt, Paul Smith
|
|
|