Re: I-D Action:draft-klensin-rfc2821bis-10.txt


Hector Santos writes:

My overall point, in so many words, was that mandating an MX recordrequirement is meaningless IF the GOAL of the mandate is to thwartbad guys.


Who cares about bad guys? Really?

Arnt

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
Re: I-D Action:draft-klensin-rfc2821bis-10.txt, (continued) Re: I-D Action:draft-klensin-rfc2821bis-10.txt, Arnt Gulbrandsen Re: I-D Action:draft-klensin-rfc2821bis-10.txt, Tony Finch Re: I-D Action:draft-klensin-rfc2821bis-10.txt, Arnt Gulbrandsen Re: I-D Action:draft-klensin-rfc2821bis-10.txt, Frank Ellermann Re: I-D Action:draft-klensin-rfc2821bis-10.txt, Alessandro Vesely Re: I-D Action:draft-klensin-rfc2821bis-10.txt, Frank Ellermann Re: I-D Action:draft-klensin-rfc2821bis-10.txt, Alessandro Vesely Re: I-D Action:draft-klensin-rfc2821bis-10.txt, Peter J. Holzer Re: I-D Action:draft-klensin-rfc2821bis-10.txt, Robert A. Rosenberg Re: I-D Action:draft-klensin-rfc2821bis-10.txt, Hector Santos Re: I-D Action:draft-klensin-rfc2821bis-10.txt, Arnt Gulbrandsen <= Re: I-D Action:draft-klensin-rfc2821bis-10.txt, Hector Santos Re: I-D Action:draft-klensin-rfc2821bis-10.txt, Paul Smith Re: I-D Action:draft-klensin-rfc2821bis-10.txt, Hector Santos Re: I-D Action:draft-klensin-rfc2821bis-10.txt, Douglas Otis Message not available IPv6 considerations (was: I-D Action:draft-klensin-rfc2821bis-10.txt), Frank Ellermann Re: I-D Action:draft-klensin-rfc2821bis-10.txt, Lisa Dusseault Re: I-D Action:draft-klensin-rfc2821bis-10.txt, Keith Moore Re: I-D Action:draft-klensin-rfc2821bis-10.txt, Hector Santos Sheep look up (was: I-D Action:draft-klensin-rfc2821bis-10.txt), Frank Ellermann Re: I-D Action:draft-klensin-rfc2821bis-10.txt, Robert A. Rosenberg