Re: current usage of AAAA implicit MX?

Dave Crocker wrote:
> > By "AAAA implicit MX", I mean: What happens if there is no MX record? 
>
> ahh.  understand.
>
> May I suggest that we call it what it is:  No-MX.

my bad.

i don't recall hearing the term 'implicit mx' used before, but it's been 
politely pointed out to me that it is in rfc2821.
we shall now all suffer a roseanna-dana moment:  never mind...

d/

--

  Dave Crocker
  Brandenburg InternetWorking
  bbiw.net