Folks,
It is worth mentioning that there already are mutliple meta-syntax standards
for email local-part strings.
While I have a vague memory of there being more than two, the ones I know
about in detail are:
RFC 3191, Minimal GSTN address format in Internet Mail
RFC 3801, Voice Profile for Internet Mail - version 2 (VPIMv2)
Please note that the BATV proposal seems to be compatible with RFC3191, in
terms of having a registered string followed by an equal sign.
Hmmm.
Perhaps this means we do not need to define a new registry, but merely add
values to the IANA GSTN Service-Selector table?
Why create a new table if we don't have to?
For that matter, why debate about a new syntax if we don't have to?...
d/
--
Dave Crocker
Brandenburg InternetWorking
bbiw.net