IETF SMTP (date)
May 27, 2008
- Re: Proposal for Adjusted DATA Timeout, ned+ietf-smtp, 19:23
- Re: Proposal for Adjusted DATA Timeout, Tony Finch, 09:45
- Re: Proposal for Adjusted DATA Timeout, Paul Smith, 09:21
- Re: Proposal for Adjusted DATA Timeout, Tony Finch, 03:36
- Re: Proposal for Adjusted DATA Timeout, Paul Smith, 02:19
- Re: Proposal for Adjusted DATA Timeout, Bill McQuillan, 00:23
May 26, 2008
- Re: Proposal for Adjusted DATA Timeout, Robert A. Rosenberg, 19:59
- Re: Proposal for Adjusted DATA Timeout, Robert A. Rosenberg, 19:59
- Re: Proposal for Adjusted DATA Timeout, Hector Santos, 17:38
- Re: Proposal for Adjusted DATA Timeout, John Levine, 14:08
- Re: Proposal for Adjusted DATA Timeout, John Levine, 14:08
- Re: Proposal for Adjusted DATA Timeout, Arnt Gulbrandsen, 13:50
- Re: Proposal for Adjusted DATA Timeout, ned+ietf-smtp, 09:00
- Re: Proposal for Adjusted DATA Timeout, Tony Finch, 02:54
- Re: Proposal for Adjusted DATA Timeout, Arnt Gulbrandsen, 01:53
- Re: Proposal for Adjusted DATA Timeout, Alessandro Vesely, 00:20
May 25, 2008
- Re: Proposal for Adjusted DATA Timeout, Tony Finch, 16:41
- Re: private key BATV is useful, mouss, 13:10
- Re: Proposal for Adjusted DATA Timeout, ned+ietf-smtp, 10:32
- Re: Proposal for Adjusted DATA Timeout, ned+ietf-smtp, 10:24
- Re: Proposal for Adjusted DATA Timeout, Hector Santos, 09:26
- Re: Proposal for Adjusted DATA Timeout, John C Klensin, 07:25
- Re: Proposal for Adjusted DATA Timeout, John Levine, 04:53
May 22, 2008
- Re: Existing email address meta-syntax standards, especially GSTN, Douglas Otis, 18:47
- Re: BATV breaks rfc2821bis?, ned+ietf-smtp, 18:10
- Re: Existing email address meta-syntax standards, especially GSTN, John Levine, 15:15
- Re: BATV pseudo-Last Call, Peter J. Holzer, 14:12
- Re: BATV breaks rfc2821bis?, Tony Hansen, 14:02
- Re: Mailing Lists v. BATV, Peter J. Holzer, 13:28
- Re: BATV breaks rfc2821bis?, Robert A. Rosenberg, 13:26
- Mailing Lists v. BATV, John Leslie, 12:55
- Re: Lose the time stamp in BATV, Peter J. Holzer, 10:52
- Re: Existing email address meta-syntax standards, especially GSTN, Douglas Otis, 10:29
- Re: BATV breaks rfc2821bis?, Alessandro Vesely, 05:10
May 21, 2008
- Re: Existing email address meta-syntax standards, especially GSTN, Douglas Otis, 19:03
- Re: vacation programs, was BATV breaks rfc2821bis?, mouss, 14:17
- Re: BATV breaks rfc2821bis?, Dave Crocker, 13:36
- Re: BATV breaks rfc2821bis?, Philip Guenther, 13:16
- Re: BATV breaks rfc2821bis?, Robert A. Rosenberg, 12:24
- Existing email address meta-syntax standards, especially GSTN, Dave Crocker, 11:27
- Re: vacation programs, was BATV breaks rfc2821bis?, ned+ietf-smtp, 09:51
May 20, 2008
- Re: vacation programs, was BATV breaks rfc2821bis?, Philip Guenther, 20:26
- Re: BATV breaks rfc2821bis?, ned+ietf-smtp, 19:53
- Re: remote signing, was BATV pseudo-Last Call, John R Levine, 19:52
- Re: vacation programs, was BATV breaks rfc2821bis?, John R Levine, 19:41
- Re: remote signing, was BATV pseudo-Last Call, ned+ietf-smtp, 19:23
- Re: remote signing, Frank Ellermann, 17:49
- Re: BATV breaks rfc2821bis?, Frank Ellermann, 17:05
- Re: BATV breaks rfc2821bis?, Philip Guenther, 16:38
- Re: remote signing, was BATV pseudo-Last Call, John R Levine, 15:58
- Re: BATV breaks rfc2821bis?, John Levine, 15:52
- Re: remote signing, was BATV pseudo-Last Call, ned+ietf-smtp, 15:45
- Re: BATV breaks rfc2821bis?, ned+ietf-smtp, 15:43
- Re: BATV breaks rfc2821bis?, Frank Ellermann, 15:04
- Re: BATV breaks rfc2821bis?, Frank Ellermann, 14:56
- Re: BATV pseudo-Last Call, Frank Ellermann, 14:29
- Re: BATV pseudo-Last Call, ned+ietf-smtp, 13:32
- Re: BATV pseudo-Last Call, Frank Ellermann, 13:01
- Re: BATV pseudo-Last Call, ned+ietf-smtp, 12:44
- Re: BATV pseudo-Last Call, Douglas Otis, 12:19
- Re: BATV breaks rfc2821bis?, John Levine, 11:31
- Re: BATV pseudo-Last Call, Tony Finch, 11:03
- Re: remote signing, was BATV pseudo-Last Call, John Levine, 11:03
- Re: BATV breaks rfc2821bis?, Tony Hansen, 10:43
- Re: BATV pseudo-Last Call, Douglas Otis, 10:32
- Re: BATV breaks rfc2821bis?, John Leslie, 10:26
- Re: BATV breaks rfc2821bis?, ned+ietf-smtp, 09:26
- Re: BATV pseudo-Last Call, ned+ietf-smtp, 09:07
- Re: BATV pseudo-Last Call, Carl S. Gutekunst, 09:02
- Re: BATV pseudo-Last Call, Tony Finch, 08:48
- Re: BATV breaks rfc2821bis?, Alessandro Vesely, 08:21
- Re: BATV pseudo-Last Call, ned+ietf-smtp, 08:18
- Re: public key BATV isn't useful, Douglas Otis, 08:17
- Re: BATV pseudo-Last Call, Tony Finch, 07:47
- Re: BATV pseudo-Last Call, ned+ietf-smtp, 07:45
- Re: BATV pseudo-Last Call, Tony Finch, 07:40
- BATV smtp extension, Dave Crocker, 07:36
- Re: BATV pseudo-Last Call, ned+ietf-smtp, 07:15
- Re: BATV pseudo-Last Call, ned+ietf-smtp, 07:15
- Re: BATV pseudo-Last Call, Paul Smith, 06:57
- Re: BATV pseudo-Last Call, mouss, 04:30
- Re: SMTP metadata transfer, Paul Smith, 03:18
- Re: BATV pseudo-Last Call, Paul Smith, 03:09
- Re: BATV pseudo-Last Call, SM, 02:43
- Re: Lose the time stamp in BATV, Paul Smith, 02:19
- Re: public key BATV isn't useful, Paul Smith, 01:59
- Re: public key BATV isn't useful, Paul Smith, 01:39
- Re: BATV pseudo-Last Call, Alessandro Vesely, 01:21
May 19, 2008
- Re: Lose the time stamp in BATV, Carl S. Gutekunst, 22:27
- Lose the time stamp in BATV, John R Levine, 21:33
- Re: BATV pseudo-Last Call, Tony Hansen, 20:49
- Re: BATV pseudo-Last Call, John Levine, 20:24
- Re: BATV pseudo-Last Call, Dave Crocker, 15:57
- Re: private key BATV is useful, John R Levine, 15:42
- Re: private key BATV is useful, mouss, 15:40
- Re: BATV pseudo-Last Call, ned+ietf-smtp, 15:33
- Re: BATV pseudo-Last Call, Dave Crocker, 11:39
- smarthosts, Tony Finch, 11:36
- Re: BATV pseudo-Last Call, ned+ietf-smtp, 11:06
- Re: BATV pseudo-Last Call, ned+ietf-smtp, 11:04
- Re: public key BATV isn't useful, Dave Crocker, 10:13
- Re: BATV doesn't fix forwarding, Alessandro Vesely, 10:11
- Re: BATV pseudo-Last Call, Hector Santos, 09:45
- Re: SMTP metadata transfer, Alexey Melnikov, 09:18
- Re: SMTP metadata transfer, Tony Finch, 09:14
- Re: public key BATV isn't useful, Paul Smith, 09:07
- Re: SMTP metadata transfer, Alexey Melnikov, 09:06
- Re: private key BATV is useful, Paul Smith, 09:00
- Re: BATV pseudo-Last Call, Tony Finch, 08:59
- Re: BATV pseudo-Last Call, Jeff Macdonald, 08:39
- Re: SMTP metadata transfer, Tony Finch, 08:37
- Re: BATV pseudo-Last Call, John Levine, 08:28
- Re: public key BATV isn't useful, Tony Hansen, 07:43
- Re: private key BATV is useful, John R Levine, 07:42
- SMTP metadata transfer, Paul Smith, 04:50
- Re: public key BATV isn't useful, Paul Smith, 04:23
- Re: BATV pseudo-Last Call, Alessandro Vesely, 04:19
- Re: public key BATV isn't useful, Alessandro Vesely, 04:19
May 18, 2008
- Re: public key BATV isn't useful, John Levine, 21:57
- Re: BATV pseudo-Last Call, Dave Crocker, 18:59
- Re: Specification "NOTE" paragraphs and normative language, John C Klensin, 16:49
- Re: Specification "NOTE" paragraphs and normative language, Dave Crocker, 16:31
- Re: Specification "NOTE" paragraphs and normative language, John C Klensin, 16:20
- Re: BATV pseudo-Last Call, John Levine, 16:00
- Re: Specification "NOTE" paragraphs and normative language, Tony Hansen, 13:49
- Re: Specification "NOTE" paragraphs and normative language, SM, 13:49
- Re: BATV pseudo-Last Call, ned+ietf-smtp, 12:21
- Re: BATV pseudo-Last Call, Steve Atkins, 12:14
- Re: BATV pseudo-Last Call, mouss, 11:50
- Re: BATV pseudo-Last Call, John Levine, 11:48
- Re: Specification "NOTE" paragraphs and normative language, Alessandro Vesely, 11:01
- Re: Specification "NOTE" paragraphs and normative language, Bill McQuillan, 10:12
- Re: BATV pseudo-Last Call, SM, 09:11
- Specification "NOTE" paragraphs and normative language, Dave Crocker, 07:40
- Re: BATV pseudo-Last Call, Peter J. Holzer, 02:38
May 17, 2008
- Re: BATV pseudo-Last Call, Dave Crocker, 22:27
- Re: BATV pseudo-Last Call, John R Levine, 13:16
- Re: BATV pseudo-Last Call, ned+ietf-smtp, 12:02
- Re: BATV pseudo-Last Call, John R Levine, 11:24
- Re: BATV pseudo-Last Call, ned+ietf-smtp, 10:45
- Re: BATV pseudo-Last Call, John Levine, 06:58
- RE: BATV pseudo-Last Call, Dan Wing, 01:23
May 08, 2008
- Re: MX lookup error handling change, Sabahattin Gucukoglu, 12:56
- Re: MX lookup error handling change, Tony Finch, 11:29
- Re: MX lookup error handling change, SM, 11:23
- Re: MX lookup error handling change, Tony Finch, 11:12
- Re: MX lookup error handling change, Robert A. Rosenberg, 10:16
- Re: MX lookup error handling change, Hector Santos, 06:33
- MX lookup error handling change, Tony Finch, 05:19
- Forwarding in SMTP, Santoshkumar K S, 00:41
May 05, 2008
- Re: Queued Mail or Unreturnable Mail?, Frank Ellermann, 13:33
- Re: Queued Mail or Unreturnable Mail?, Douglas Otis, 11:22
- Re: Queued Mail or Unreturnable Mail?, Hector Santos, 10:54
- Re: Queued Mail or Unreturnable Mail?, Hector Santos, 10:49
- Re: Queued Mail or Unreturnable Mail?, Douglas Otis, 10:27
- Re: Queued Mail or Unreturnable Mail?, Sabahattin Gucukoglu, 06:43
- Re: Queued Mail or Unreturnable Mail?, Frank Ellermann, 05:03
- Re: Queued Mail or Unreturnable Mail?, Alessandro Vesely, 03:14
- Re: Queued Mail or Unreturnable Mail?, Douglas Otis, 00:38