Re: Proposal for Adjusted DATA Timeout

ietf-smtp

Re: Proposal for Adjusted DATA Timeout

2008-05-25 16:41:35


On Sun, 25 May 2008, ned+ietf-smtp(_at_)mrochek(_dot_)com wrote:

Are you increasing timeouts past 10 minutes, or past some lower default
you use for normal mail?


Usually, but not always, the latter.


The only times I have had timeout-related problems is when someone has
told their MTA to use a timeout less than the minimum permitted.

Tony.
-- 
f.anthony.n.finch  <dot(_at_)dotat(_dot_)at>  http://dotat.at/
FISHER: NORTHEAST 5 OR 6. SLIGHT OR MODERATE. FAIR. GOOD.

[More with this subject...]

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
Proposal for Adjusted DATA Timeout, Hector Santos Re: Proposal for Adjusted DATA Timeout, John C Klensin Re: Proposal for Adjusted DATA Timeout, ned+ietf-smtp Re: Proposal for Adjusted DATA Timeout, SM Re: Proposal for Adjusted DATA Timeout, John Levine Re: Proposal for Adjusted DATA Timeout, ned+ietf-smtp Re: Proposal for Adjusted DATA Timeout, Tony Finch <= Re: Proposal for Adjusted DATA Timeout, Arnt Gulbrandsen Re: Proposal for Adjusted DATA Timeout, Tony Finch Re: Proposal for Adjusted DATA Timeout, John Levine Re: Proposal for Adjusted DATA Timeout, Hector Santos Re: Proposal for Adjusted DATA Timeout, ned+ietf-smtp Re: Proposal for Adjusted DATA Timeout, Arnt Gulbrandsen Re: Proposal for Adjusted DATA Timeout, John Levine Re: Proposal for Adjusted DATA Timeout, ned+ietf-smtp Re: Proposal for Adjusted DATA Timeout, Robert A. Rosenberg Re: Proposal for Adjusted DATA Timeout, John C Klensin

Previous by Date:	Re: private key BATV is useful, mouss
Next by Date:	Re: Proposal for Adjusted DATA Timeout, Alessandro Vesely
Previous by Thread:	Re: Proposal for Adjusted DATA Timeout, ned+ietf-smtp
Next by Thread:	Re: Proposal for Adjusted DATA Timeout, Arnt Gulbrandsen
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]