Re: BATV breaks rfc2821bis?




Philip Guenther wrote:

Nope, the 'for' clause of Received headers is not part of the check.



Folk,

How does this sub-thread relate to BATV?

d/
--

  Dave Crocker
  Brandenburg InternetWorking
  bbiw.net

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
Re: BATV breaks rfc2821bis?, (continued) Re: BATV breaks rfc2821bis?, John Levine Re: BATV breaks rfc2821bis?, Philip Guenther Re: vacation programs, was BATV breaks rfc2821bis?, John R Levine Re: vacation programs, was BATV breaks rfc2821bis?, Philip Guenther Re: vacation programs, was BATV breaks rfc2821bis?, ned+ietf-smtp Re: vacation programs, was BATV breaks rfc2821bis?, mouss Re: BATV breaks rfc2821bis?, Frank Ellermann Re: BATV breaks rfc2821bis?, ned+ietf-smtp Re: BATV breaks rfc2821bis?, Robert A. Rosenberg Re: BATV breaks rfc2821bis?, Philip Guenther Re: BATV breaks rfc2821bis?, Dave Crocker <= Re: BATV breaks rfc2821bis?, Robert A. Rosenberg Re: BATV breaks rfc2821bis?, Tony Hansen Re: BATV breaks rfc2821bis?, ned+ietf-smtp Re: BATV breaks rfc2821bis?, Frank Ellermann Re: BATV breaks rfc2821bis?, ned+ietf-smtp Re: BATV breaks rfc2821bis?, Tony Hansen Re: BATV pseudo-Last Call, ned+ietf-smtp BATV smtp extension, Dave Crocker Re: BATV pseudo-Last Call, Tony Finch Re: BATV pseudo-Last Call, ned+ietf-smtp

Previous by Date:	Re: BATV breaks rfc2821bis?, Philip Guenther
Next by Date:	Re: vacation programs, was BATV breaks rfc2821bis?, mouss
Previous by Thread:	Re: BATV breaks rfc2821bis?, Philip Guenther
Next by Thread:	Re: BATV breaks rfc2821bis?, Robert A. Rosenberg
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]