[Top] [All Lists]

Re: BATV breaks rfc2821bis?

2008-05-22 14:02:07

A Bcc header *can* be included in the version of the message going to the bcc'd user. *Some* MUAs split the message into multiple versions: the ones going to the To's/Cc's do not have the Bcc: header, and the ones going to each of the Bcc's have just that user listed. Other MUAs choose a simpler method of just stripping Bcc: entirely and sending the same version to all users.

        Tony Hansen

Robert A. Rosenberg wrote:
Thank you for your reply. I read RFC5230 after I had sent my query so I had seen that info. OTOH, I think the RFC in allowing bcc and/or resent-bcc headers to be considered is in error since these headers should never occur in the transmitted text of the message (the bcc is stripped when the message is originally injected so it is not there and thus I do not know if a resent-bcc can be created) unless something is broken (such as the Apparently-To header injection bug that occurred in the absence of any To/Cc addresses).

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>