On 18 Oct 2010, at 17:53, Murray S. Kucherawy wrote:
It looks to me like there’s an ABNF citation issue in RFC5321. Section
4.1.2’s ABNF makes reference to “atext” but it’s not defined anywhere. It is
defined in RFC5322 though.
Agreed, I have reported this here already as well. I'm afraid it slipped when
I was doing the final review. "String" is also declared but never used in any
of the syntax.
I don’t see this covered in any RFC5321 errata. Shall I open one?
I should. The omission can be put down to an editorial nit.