[Top] [All Lists]

Re: ABNF in RFC5321

2010-10-19 09:20:48

If an errata were to be filed or an issue in the YAM tracker were to be filed, it should use the description in Tony Finch's email message.


On 10/18/2010 3:01 PM, SM wrote:

Hi Murray,
At 09:53 18-10-10, Murray S. Kucherawy wrote:
It looks to me like there's an ABNF citation issue in RFC5321. Section 4.1.2's ABNF makes reference to "atext" but it's not defined anywhere. It is defined in RFC5322 though.

I noticed that some time back.

I don't see this covered in any RFC5321 errata.  Shall I open one?

If you post the suggested change to the YAM mailing list, it will be tracked.


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>