If an errata were to be filed or an issue in the YAM tracker were to be
filed, it should use the description in Tony Finch's email message.
On 10/18/2010 3:01 PM, SM wrote:
At 09:53 18-10-10, Murray S. Kucherawy wrote:
It looks to me like there's an ABNF citation issue in RFC5321.
Section 4.1.2's ABNF makes reference to "atext" but it's not defined
anywhere. It is defined in RFC5322 though.
I noticed that some time back.
I don't see this covered in any RFC5321 errata. Shall I open one?
If you post the suggested change to the YAM mailing list, it will be