[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Comments on: draft-melnikov-smtp-priority-02

2011-07-13 02:23:40

On Tue, 2011-07-12, Alexey Melnikov wrote:

Section 3, item 5:

This seems to reject that PRIORITY 0 should mean "Normal"
Can you elaborate on why you think so?

In this sentence:

A value of 0 indicates an email from a client/network not
supporting priorities or intended to be sent to such a server/
network; this is the same as not specifying the PRIORITY

The possibility that I might want to send a priority 0 (normal)
message FROM a conforming system TO a conforming system seems not
to be considered.

Bill McQuillan <McQuilWP(_at_)pobox(_dot_)com>