Re: SMTP and Kerberos

ietf-smtp

2011-11-04 18:46:03


On 11/4/11 2:54 PM, Douglas Otis wrote:

Just guessing, it seems growth will top out at 1.4 trillion (a millionmillion) /64 equivalent prefixes.

Correction: 10^15 not 10^12.

Just guessing, it seems growth will top out at 1.4 quadrillion (athousand trillion) /64 equivalent prefixes.


-Doug

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
Re: SMTP Kerberos Considerations, (continued) Re: SMTP Kerberos Considerations, ned+ietf-smtp Re: SMTP Kerberos Considerations, Keith Moore Re: SMTP Kerberos Considerations, Russ Allbery Re: SMTP Kerberos Considerations, Robert A. Rosenberg SMTP and Kerberos (was: Re: smtp-traffic-control), John C Klensin Re: SMTP and Kerberos, Douglas Otis Re: SMTP and Kerberos, Hector Santos Re: SMTP and Kerberos, Douglas Otis Re: SMTP and Kerberos, Hector Santos Re: SMTP and Kerberos, Douglas Otis Re: SMTP and Kerberos, Douglas Otis <= Re: SMTP and Kerberos, Russ Allbery Re: draft-atkins-smtp-traffic-control, Douglas Otis Re: draft-atkins-smtp-traffic-control, Steve Atkins SMTP Kerberos support, Hector Santos Re: SMTP Kerberos support, Douglas Otis Re: draft-atkins-smtp-traffic-control, Alessandro Vesely

Previous by Date:	Re: SMTP and Kerberos, Douglas Otis
Next by Date:	Re: SMTP Kerberos Considerations, Robert A. Rosenberg
Previous by Thread:	Re: SMTP and Kerberos, Douglas Otis
Next by Thread:	Re: SMTP and Kerberos, Russ Allbery
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]