On 14 November 2011 23:35, S Moonesamy wrote:
I would appreciate some feedback on draft-moonesamy-smtp-ipv6-00.
Hi, apparently you've removed the MX examples; including the hint
that a primary IPvX-only MX cannot be combined with a secondary
IPvY-only (X != Y). It is kind of obvious, but it helped me to
understand what RFC 3974 was about.
Maybe it could make sense to discuss the IPv6-only behaviour if
IPv4 addresses are reachable by some mapping mechanism. It's not
exactly "on topic" for your draft, but I'd be interested to know
how that's supposed to work in 2011 (the last time I tried to get
the idea was for RFC 4408, but there are many new IPv6 RFCs...)