wfm.
d/
On 4/10/2013 5:12 PM, Tony Finch wrote:
The proper ESMTP style for this would be
(1) an EHLO keyword to say the server supports the feature
(2) a MAIL parameter for the client to enable the feature
Do you need more signalling than that? I think adding syntax to the message
body reply would be a bad idea, since that is usually used to feed back trace
info (queue ID). Perhaps you could have a new command to be used (pipelined)
after the body to retrieve the IMAP status. Would that make the MAIL parameter
redundant?
--
Dave Crocker
Brandenburg InternetWorking
bbiw.net
_______________________________________________
ietf-smtp mailing list
ietf-smtp(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-smtp