At 18:03 17-10-2013, Ned Freed wrote:
I am in complete agreement with this. I think all references to DKIM needs to
be dropped from this draft. DKIM is not an end-to-end signature or encryption
mechanism in any case, and adapting it to be used this way diverts attention
away from what should be the focus here: Protecting the contents of
messages in
transit.
There are cases where DKIM verification will fail. These cases are
significant enough to avoid DKIM as an end-to-end mechanism. Note
that the are use-cases where DKIM may be appropriate but that is not
really relevant to the problem the draft tries to solve.
Regards,
-sm
_______________________________________________
ietf-smtp mailing list
ietf-smtp(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-smtp