[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [ietf-smtp] DKIM encryption, was Request for discussion

2013-10-18 09:44:18
At 18:03 17-10-2013, Ned Freed wrote:
I am in complete agreement with this. I think all references to DKIM needs to
be dropped from this draft. DKIM is not an end-to-end signature or encryption
mechanism in any case, and adapting it to be used this way diverts attention
away from what should be the focus here: Protecting the contents of messages in

There are cases where DKIM verification will fail. These cases are significant enough to avoid DKIM as an end-to-end mechanism. Note that the are use-cases where DKIM may be appropriate but that is not really relevant to the problem the draft tries to solve.

ietf-smtp mailing list

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>